Dextromethorphan for the treatment of neuropathic pain: a double-blind randomised controlled crossover trial with integral n-of-1 design

184Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim was to compare the analgesic effectiveness and adverse effect incidence of oral dextromethorphan (DM) with placebo in patients with neuropathic pain. The first 10-day treatment period was a multiple-dose double-blind randomised controlled cross-over comparison of 13.5 mg of DM 3 times a day (t.d.s.) with placebo t.d.s.: 5 treatment pairs, each pair 1 day DM and 1 day placebo. The second 10-day treatment period used 27 mg of DM t.d.s. vs. placebo, with the same design. The study incorporated a 5 pair n-of-1 design for each of the 2 doses of DM. Patients took the study medication in addition to any pre-existing analgesic regime. Patients who reported benefit could continue with DM after the study. Nineteen patients with chronic neuropathic pain were studied over two 10-day treatment periods. Outcome measures were pain intensity, pain relief, adverse effects, mood, sleep and global rating of treatment. These were recorded by daily patient diaries and by clinic assessments before and after each treatment period. There were no significant differences between DM and placebo on any of the clinic assessment outcome measures. Two patients had significantly better analgesia on more than one outcome measure on within-patient testing. One had better analgesia with DM. The other had better analgesia with placebo. Ten patients had no adverse effects on either dose of DM. Two patients withdrew during the first treatment period because of adverse effects (which included increased pain intensity), and 5 during the second period. Five patients continued with DM after the study for 1-3 months. No long-term clinical benefit was apparent in those who continued with open DM. Dextromethorphan at either 40.5 or 81 mg daily did not relieve neuropathic pain. © 1994.

References Powered by Scopus

The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods

5707Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain

919Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Behavioral and autonomic correlates of the tactile evoked allodynia produced by spinal glycine inhibition: effects of modulatory receptor systems and excitatory amino acid antagonists

590Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: An evidence based proposal

1178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy of pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: An update and effect related to mechanism of drug action

1102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EFNS guidelines on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain

762Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McQuay, H. J., Carroll, D., Jadad, A. R., Glynn, C. J., Jack, T., Moore, R. A., & Wiffen, P. J. (1994). Dextromethorphan for the treatment of neuropathic pain: a double-blind randomised controlled crossover trial with integral n-of-1 design. Pain, 59(1), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90056-6

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

47%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

27%

Researcher 8

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

57%

Psychology 6

21%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

11%

Computer Science 3

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0