PRevalence of Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence Surgical Evaluation (P.R.A.I.S.E.): Rationale and design of a multi-center cross-sectional study.

8Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Intimate partner violence (IPV) is described by the American Medical Association as "a pattern of coercive behaviors that may include repeated battering and injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive social isolation, deprivation, and intimidation." The long-term consequences of IPV include health risks, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and staggering economic costs for health care of victims. Intimate partner violence is often underreported among women who seek medical attention. The current study seeks to address the issue of possible underreporting of IPV in orthopaedic fracture clinics by establishing prevalence rates of IPV among women seeking treatment for musculoskeletal injuries. Methods/Design. We propose a cross-sectional multicenter study wherein 3,600 women will complete a self-reported written questionnaire across clinical sites in North America, Europe, and Australia. Recruitment of participants will take place at orthopaedic fracture clinics at each clinical site. The questionnaire will contain a validated set of questions used to screen for IPV, as well as questions that pertain to the participant's demographic, injury characteristics, and experiences with health care utilization. Female patients presenting to the orthopaedic fracture clinics will complete two validated self-reported written questionnaires (Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) and the Partner Violence Screen (PVS)) to determine the prevalence of IPV in the past 12 months and in their lifetime. The two questionnaires were designed for rapid assessment of IPV status in emergency departments, family practice, and women's health clinics that we believe are similar to our intended setting of an orthopaedic clinic. Discussion. If the prevalence of IPV among women attending orthopaedic clinics is greater than the current perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons, this study will serve to advocate for the continued education of medical professionals to better recognize probable IPV cases and offer existing services to enhance the care of these patients. © 2010 Bhandari; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences

762Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tools. A Systematic Review

391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prevalence of abuse and intimate partner violence surgical evaluation (PRAISE) in orthopaedic fracture clinics: A multinational prevalence study

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measures for screening for intimate partner violence: A systematic review

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Across Medical and Surgical Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

PRevalence of Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence Surgical Evaluation (P.R.A.I.S.E.): Rationale and design of a multi-center cross-sectional study. (2010). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-77

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 59

66%

Researcher 23

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 37

43%

Psychology 29

34%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

12%

Social Sciences 10

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free