Principles of signal detection in pharmacovigilance

216Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Adverse drug effects are manifold and heterogenous. Many situations may hamper the signalling (i.e. the detection of early warning signs) of adverse effects and new signals often differ from previous experiences. Signals have qualitative and quantitative aspects. Different categories of adverse effects need different methods for detection. Current pharmacovigilance is predominantly based on spontaneous reporting and is mainly helpful in detecting type B effects (those effects that are often allergic or idiosyncratic reactions, characteristically occurring in only a minority of patients and usually unrelated to dosage and that are serious, unexpected and unpredictable) and unusual type A effects (those effects that are related to the pharmacological effects of the drug and are dosage-related). Examples of other sources of signals are prescription event monitoring, large automated data resources on morbidity and drug use (including record linkage), case-control surveillance and follow-up studies. Type C effects (those effects related to an increased frequency of 'spontaneous' disease) are difficult to study, however, and continue to pose a pharmacoepidemiological challenge. Seven basic considerations can be identified that determine the evidence contained in a signal: quantitative strength of the association, consistency of the data, exposure response relationship, biological plausibility, experimental findings, possible analogies and the nature and quality of the data. A proposal is made for a standard signal management procedure at pharmacovigilance centres, including the following steps: signal delineation, literature search, preliminary inventory of data, collection of additional information, consultation with the World Health Organization Centre for International Drug Monitoring and the relevant drug companies, aggregated data assessment and a report in writing. A better understanding of the conditions and mechanisms involved in the detection of adverse drug effects may further improve strategies for pharmacovigilance.

References Powered by Scopus

The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?

8110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pharmacoepidemiology

354Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality criteria for early signals of possible adverse drug reactions

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation

996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection is spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions

984Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of data mining in pharmacovigilance

223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyboom, R. H. B., Egberts, A. C. G., Edwards, I. R., Hekster, Y. A., De Koning, F. H. P., & Gribnau, F. W. J. (1997). Principles of signal detection in pharmacovigilance. Drug Safety. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199716060-00002

Readers over time

‘10‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

68%

Researcher 14

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 40

55%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 24

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

7%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0