The rheology of two-phase magmas: A review and analysis

354Citations
Citations of this article
326Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider the current state of our understanding of the rheology of two-phase magmas, that is suspensions of either bubbles or crystals in a viscous silicate melt. The discussion is restricted to strain-rates at which the suspending melt can be considered Newtonian. We start by considering the range of textures found in magmas and the bubble deformation and particle motions caused by shearing. We then review proposed models for suspensions, focussing on those functions of the form ηr=f(φ) or τ=fγ̇ that have been most widely used to describe magmatic systems (ηr is the relative apparent viscosity of the suspension, φ is the volume fraction of the suspended phase, τ is the driving stress, and γ̇ is the strain-rate). Both theoretical and empirical methods are presented and then compared against the available analogue (i.e. non-magmatic) and magmatic data. The paper contains new data and significant re-analysis of previously published data. We present a new semi-empirical constitutive model for bubble-bearing magmas that is valid for steady and unsteady flow and large strains and strain-rates. This equation utilises a new parameter, the capillarity Cx, that encapsulates the combined effect of shearing and unsteadiness on bubble suspensions. We also present a new scheme for dealing with polydispersivity of bubble suspensions. New data on the rheology of particle suspensions undergoing forced-oscillations are presented. These data show that the Cox-Merz rule only holds for dilute particle suspensions φ≲0.25. A re-analysis of all available experimental data that relate rheology to particle aspect ratio provides distinct curves of maximum packing as a function of aspect ratio for smooth and rough particles with magmatic data lying on the curve appropriate for rough particles. We analyse several rheological datasets of crystal-bearing basaltic magmas and find that they are in good agreement with the constitutive equations derived from analogue data. By contrast, the same equations do not agree well with data for high-viscosity, haplogranitic melts. This may be an effect of fracturing or viscous dissipation within these samples. The paper concludes with a practical 'rheological recipes' section giving a step-by-step method for calculating a constitutive equation for a two-phase magmatic suspension and assessing its likely accuracy. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Eine neue Bestimmung der Moleküldimensionen

2969Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Mechanism for Non-Newtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres

2949Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles

2121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Silicic magma reservoirs in the Earth's crust

361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formation and dynamics of magma reservoirs

243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamics of the Yellowstone hydrothermal system

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mader, H. M., Llewellin, E. W., & Mueller, S. P. (2013, May 1). The rheology of two-phase magmas: A review and analysis. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.02.014

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 150

63%

Researcher 68

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 203

86%

Engineering 22

9%

Chemistry 8

3%

Materials Science 4

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0