The sustainable mobility paradigm

1.7kCitations
Citations of this article
3.3kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper has two main parts. The first questions two of the underlying principles of conventional transport planning on travel as a derived demand and on travel cost minimisation. It suggests that the existing paradigm ought to be more flexible, particularly if the sustainable mobility agenda is to become a reality. The second part argues that policy measures are available to improve urban sustainability in transport terms but that the main challenges relate to the necessary conditions for change. These conditions are dependent upon high-quality implementation of innovative schemes, and the need to gain public confidence and acceptability to support these measures through active involvement and action. Seven key elements of sustainable mobility are outlined, so that public acceptability can be more effectively promoted. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations

678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promoting Safe Walking and Cycling to Improve Public Health: Lessons from The Netherlands and Germany

624Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social exclusion, mobility and access

495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies

784Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy

740Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited

416Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250150300450600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1435

75%

Researcher 243

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 152

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 95

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 694

42%

Social Sciences 541

33%

Environmental Science 256

16%

Business, Management and Accounting 160

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0