Wilderness and biodiversity conservation

655Citations
Citations of this article
1.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Human pressure threatens many species and ecosystems, so conservation efforts necessarily prioritize saving them. However, conservation should clearly be proactive wherever possible. In this article, we assess the biodiversity conservation value, and specifically the irreplaceability in terms of species endemism, of those of the planet's ecosystems that remain intact. We find that 24 wilderness areas, all ≥1 million hectares, are ≥70% intact and have human densities of less than or equal to five people per km 2. This wilderness covers 44% of all land but is inhabited by only 3% of people. Given this sparse population, wilderness conservation is cost-effective, especially if ecosystem service value is incorporated. Soberingly, however, most wilderness is not speciose: only 18% of plants and 10% of terrestrial vertebrates are endemic to individual wildernesses, the majority restricted to Amazonia, Congo, New Guinea, the Miombo-Mopane woodlands, and the North American deserts. Global conservation strategy must target these five wildernesses while continuing to prioritize threatened biodiversity hotspots.

References Powered by Scopus

Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

23313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human domination of Earth's ecosystems

7257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth

6759Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - Ecosystem service management

3374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global biodiversity conservation priorities

1785Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world

1405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Brooks, T. M., Pilgrim, J. D., Konstant, W. R., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kormos, C. (2003). Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(18), 10309–10313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1732458100

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2504590135180

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 604

58%

Researcher 283

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 118

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 30

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 643

59%

Environmental Science 370

34%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 44

4%

Social Sciences 40

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
References: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0