An airborne assessment of atmospheric particulate emissions from the processing of Athabasca oil sands

23Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During the Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) campaign, two NASA research aircraft, a DC-8 and a P-3B, were outfitted with extensive trace gas (the DC-8) and aerosol (both aircraft) instrumentation. Each aircraft spent about a half hour sampling air around the oil sands mining and upgrading facilities near Ft. McMurray, Alberta, Canada. The DC-8 circled the area, while the P-3B flew directly over the upgrading plants, sampling close to the exhaust stacks, then headed downwind to monitor the aerosol as it aged. At short range, the plume from the oil sands is a complex mosaic of freshly nucleated ultrafine particles from a SO2- and NO2-rich plume, soot and possibly fly ash from industrial processes, and dust from dirt roads and mining operations. Shortly downwind, organic aerosol appears in quantities that rival SO4, either as volatile organic vapors condense or as they react with the H2SO 4. The DC-8 pattern allowed us to integrate total flux from the oil sands facilities within about a factor of 2 uncertainty that spanned values consistent with 2008 estimates from reported SO2 and NO2 emissions, though there is no reason to expect one flyby to represent average conditions. In contrast, CO fluxes exceeded reported regional emissions, due either to variability in production or sources missing from the emissions inventory. The conversion rate of SO2 to aerosol SO4 of ~6% per hour is consistent with earlier reports, though OH concentrations are insufficient to accomplish this. Other oxidation pathways must be active. Altogether, organic aerosol and black carbon emissions from the oil sands operations are small compared with annual forest fire emissions in Canada. The oil sands do contribute significant sulfate and exceed fire production of SO2 by an order of magnitude. © Author(s) 2014.

Figures

  • Figure 2. The Suncor facility about 12 s before the P-3B encountered the white/gray plume. Stacks emitting darker plumes are visible to the left. The Athabasca River, settling ponds, and mined areas are visible in the background. The image is a still from a windshieldmounted video camera.
  • Figure 3. Flight tracks during ARCTAS that passed near the oil sands facilities. Red traces are the P-3B; DC-8 tracks are blue. Emphasized sections are where the aircraft intercepted the plume.
  • Figure 4. Data along the P-3B flight track shown in Fig. 1. Syncrude upgrader plume penetrations occurred at points A, B, and D, while the Suncor plume was encountered at point C. Light-blue regions indicate periods when the plane was among clouds; darker blue shows cloud penetrations. Note that the UCN and CN saturate at 1× 105 cm−3 and 3× 104 cm−3, respectively; actual values are higher than shown. The AMS was on a 5 s cycle, blanking half the time, so it may have missed peak concentrations. CN, CO, and scattering (Bsp) are on log scales; CO has the minimum concentration of 93.6 subtracted. The light-blue background shows periods among clouds; darker blue indicates cloud penetrations. Light scattering, Bsp, is at 550 nm.
  • Figure 5. The oil sands plume as seen by in situ instruments on the DC-8. The light-blue region was when the plane was upwind of the facilities, while light brown indicates the plume. The plane flew parallel to the wind at 18:34, so no flux could be calculated. The gap at 18:43 is there because of the NO2 and Bap spikes, which appear consistent with diesel truck traffic. The period from 18:25 to 18:28 was downwind of both mining operations and the town of Ft. McMurray. Scattering, Bsp, is at 550 nm, while absorption, Bap, is at 532 nm.
  • Figure 6. Aerosol volume superimposed on some of the data from Fig. 5. The upper panel shows total and submicron light scattering at 550 nm and the coarse aerosol volume distributions measured by the APS. The lower panel shows UCN, CNcold and CNhot over sub-µm volume distribution from the UHSAS. Pale traces show UCN and CNcold saturation; true values are higher.
  • Figure 7. (A) Near-infrared (1064 nm) lidar curtain as the DC-8 approached the oil sands area. The plane was at 5.5 km until 18:10, when it started descending. Gray areas are the blanking interval around the plane, below ground level, or obscured by cloud. The plume is obvious starting at about 18:03 with a maximum at 18:06. Note that cloud partly obscures the peak, so the aerosol scattering ratio is an underestimate. Around 18:04 some of the plume is clearly exiting the mixed layer, perhaps due to convection associated with the cloud remnant at 3.2 km. The dashed line is the mixed-layer top (from Fig. 8) and the magenta line is at the altitude of the in situ plume penetration. (B) Location of the curtain with respect to sources and the plume as observed in situ. The track from 17:50 to 18:15 is colored with the lidar curtain data from the in situ altitude, while the low-altitude loop is colored by SO2 concentration. Magenta arrows show 2 h of wind advection as measured by the DC-8.
  • Figure 8. Vertical profile data from the DC-8 near the oil sands plume. Aerosol backscatter ratios are from 18:06:20 (near the peak of the plume downwind of the sampling loop) and 18:10:20 (near where the lidar curtain crossed the sampling loop). Other data are from the descent into (thin lines) and ascent out of (thick lines) the sampling leg, which occurred upwind of the emissions sources. The choice of mixed layer depth, zm, for the flux calculation was based on the lidar data. Potential temperature indicates a surprisingly stable boundary layer. In contrast, water vapor and RH suggest that the mixed layer extends to near cloud base at 2.0 to 2.2 km.
  • Figure 9. Relationship between BC mass and aerosol light absorption from the P-3B from directly over the upgrader facilities (10 July) and from about 10 km downwind (29 June). One-second data have been smoothed with a 21-point box filter, and periods on 10 July where the PSAP fluctuated wildly due to humidity transitions in the plumes have been eliminated. The dotted lines are not fits to the data; they are shown to illustrate that the data obtained were similar to literature values for uncoated (8 m2 g−1) and coated (15 m2 g−1) soot.

References Powered by Scopus

Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review

2148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer

1637Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Black carbon or brown carbon? the nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols

1605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Oil and gas impacts on air quality in federal lands in the Bakken region: An overview of the Bakken Air Quality Study and first results

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sources of particulate matter components in the Athabasca oil sands region: Investigation through a comparison of trace element measurement methodologies

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial variation in nutrient dynamics among five different peatland types in the Alberta oil sands region

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howell, S. G., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., McNaughton, C. S., Kapustin, V., Brekovskikh, V., … Cubison, M. J. (2014). An airborne assessment of atmospheric particulate emissions from the processing of Athabasca oil sands. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(10), 5073–5087. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5073-2014

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

52%

Researcher 14

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 17

40%

Chemistry 11

26%

Engineering 10

23%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0