Altruistic punishment in humans

3.8kCitations
Citations of this article
3.0kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Human cooperation is an evolutionary puzzle. Unlike other creatures, people frequently cooperate with genetically unrelated strangers, often in large groups, with people they will never meet again, and when reputation gains are small or absent. These patterns of cooperation cannot be explained by the nepotistic motives associated with the evolutionary theory of kin selection and the selfish motives associated with signalling theory or the theory of reciprocal altruism. Here we show experimentally that the altruistic punishment of defectors is a key motive for the explanation of cooperation. Altruistic punishment means that individuals punish, although the punishment is costly for them and yields no material gain. We show that cooperation flourishes if altruistic punishment is possible, and breaks down if it is ruled out. The evidence indicates that negative emotions towards defectors are the proximate mechanism behind altruistic punishment. These results suggest that future study of the evolution of human cooperation should include a strong focus on explaining altruistic punishment.

References Powered by Scopus

The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I

10290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The evolution of cooperation

6134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring

1958Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Five rules for the evolution of cooperation

4369Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The nature of human altruism

2455Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems

2296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a

Readers over time

‘08‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25085170255340

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1389

64%

Researcher 390

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 291

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 93

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 841

45%

Social Sciences 353

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 353

19%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 335

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 6
News Mentions: 17
References: 12
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 20

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0