Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA

392Citations
Citations of this article
510Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hydrologic similarity between catchments, derived from similarity in how catchments respond to precipitation input, is the basis for catchment classification, for transferability of information, for generalization of our hydrologic understanding and also for understanding the potential impacts of environmental change. An important question in this context is, how far can widely available hydrologic information (precipitation-temperature-streamflow data and generally available physical descriptors) be used to create a first order grouping of hydrologically similar catchments? We utilize a heterogeneous dataset of 280 catchments located in the Eastern US to understand hydrologic similarity in a 6-dimensional signature space across a region with strong environmental gradients. Signatures are defined as hydrologic response characteristics that provide insight into the hydrologic function of catchments. A Bayesian clustering scheme is used to separate the catchments into 9 homogeneous classes, which enable us to interpret hydrologic similarity with respect to similarity in climatic and landscape attributes across this region. We finally derive several hypotheses regarding controls on individual signatures from the analysis performed here. © 2011 Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

10860Citations
7037Readers
Get full text
8697Citations
6122Readers
Get full text

Comparing partitions

6828Citations
1721Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., & Carrillo, G. (2011). Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(9), 2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 232

65%

Researcher 79

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 32

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 125

35%

Environmental Science 118

33%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 97

27%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free