Comparing C- and L-band SAR images for sea ice motion estimation

28Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pairs of consecutive C-band synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) images are routinely used for sea ice motion estimation. The L-band radar has a fundamentally different character, as its longer wavelength penetrates deeper into sea ice. L-band SAR provides information on the seasonal sea ice inner structure in addition to the surface roughness that dominates C-band images. This is especially useful in the Baltic Sea, which lacks multiyear ice and icebergs, known to be confusing targets for L-band sea ice classification. In this work, L-band SAR images are investigated for sea ice motion estimation using the well-established maximal cross-correlation (MCC) approach. This work provides the first comparison of L-band and C-band SAR images for the purpose of motion estimation. The cross-correlation calculations are hardware accelerated using new OpenCL-based source code, which is made available through the author's web site. It is found that L-band images are preferable for motion estimation over C-band images. It is also shown that motion estimation is possible between a C-band and an L-band image using the maximal cross-correlation technique.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Satellite images used in this work, normalized for viewing. Details given in Table 1. ©MDA, ESA and JAXA.
  • Figure 2. Wind and air temperature recorded by the Kemi 1 lighthouse weather station (65.385◦ N, 25.096◦ E) during the experiment period. Timing of SAR images is also marked, red for C-band and blue for L-band images.
  • Table 1. List of satellite images used in this work.
  • Figure 3. True colour satellite image of the Bay of Bothnia, 18 March 2009, 10:05 UTC. Image captured by the MODIS instrument on board the Terra satellite, courtesy of NASA.
  • Figure 4. Screenshot of the motion estimation program written for this work. (a) Zoom-in of the first image with some detected motion vectors. (b) The cross-correlation result for the circled vector. White represents maximum cross-correlation, black represents zero correlation and the area left outside of the calculation. Red represents negative cross-correlation. (c) Aligned zoom-in of the second image of the pair. Notice the newly formed NW–SE aligned leads. The thin red lines are rulers that highlight the mouse cursor’s location.
  • Figure 5. Detail of landfast ice in northern Bay of Bothnia on 18 March 2009. White tracks are shipping lanes to Tornio and Kemi, which appear very bright in SAR images.
  • Fig. 6. Detail of landfast ice in northern Bay of Bothnia around Hailuoto, offshore from Oulu, on 18. March 2009.
  • Figure 7. Elliptic dark area classified as level ice near Raahe on 18 March 2009.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lehtiranta, J., Siiriä, S., & Karvonen, J. (2015). Comparing C- and L-band SAR images for sea ice motion estimation. Cryosphere, 9(1), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-357-2015

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

63%

Researcher 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 10

67%

Environmental Science 3

20%

Chemistry 1

7%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0