Critical evaluation and reflection on the role of the supervisor of midwives within the maternity services

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates and reflects upon an aspect of change (introduction of new electronic records) that occurred in contemporary practice, from a supervisor of midwives' (SoM) viewpoint. The statutory framework of supervision is contextualised (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2011a; 2012), followed by a brief discussion as to why records are important. To facilitate critical analysis of the implementation of a new electronic records system, an adaptation of John Kotter's (1996) eight-step process to change by Kotter and Rathgeber (2006) (Figure 1) is utilised. Throughout the paper the SoM's role, in relation to implementing, supporting and evaluating a change in practice, are debated (including actual actions or suggestions of how to facilitate change). Utilising Leamon's Fusion Framework for reflection (2012) (Figure 2), the change to practice is considered and recommendations for future practice shared (Stewart, 2002). Finally, the paper offers a conclusion summarising the key points debated. © 2013 MA Healthcare Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Transformation or change: Some prescriptions for health care organizations

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An evaluation of the nursing practice environment and successful change management using the new generation Magnet Model

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Establishing perceptions of a good midwife: A Delphi study

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Embracing change

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnfather, T. (2013). Critical evaluation and reflection on the role of the supervisor of midwives within the maternity services. British Journal of Midwifery, 21(7), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2013.21.7.503

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 6

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

36%

Social Sciences 2

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free