The demographic transition: Are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation?

217Citations
Citations of this article
260Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The radical shift in human reproduction in the late 19th century, known as the demographic transition, constitutes a major challenge to evolutionary approaches to human bahaviour. Why would people ever choose to limit their reproduction voluntarily when, at the peak of the industrial Revolution, resources were apparently so plentiful? Can the transition be attributed to standard life history tradeoffs, it is a consequences of cultural evolutionary processes, or it simply a maladaptive outcome of novel and environmental social conditions? Empirical analyses and new models suggests that reproductive decision making might be driven by a human psychology designed by natural selection to maximize material wealth. If this is the case, the mechanisms governing fertility and parental investment are likely to respond to modern conditions with a fertility level much lower than that that would maximize fitness.

References Powered by Scopus

The Significance of Clutch‐size

1255Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution and the demand for children

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The decline of fertility: Innovation or adjustment process

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analyzing adaptive strategies: Human behavioral ecology at twenty-five

451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Life history traits in humans: Theory and Empirical Studies

399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters

253Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1998, July 1). The demographic transition: Are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01357-3

Readers over time

‘08‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2407142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 102

53%

Researcher 45

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 40

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78

44%

Social Sciences 63

35%

Psychology 24

13%

Environmental Science 13

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0