Development and evaluation of a new multi-metal binding biosorbent

36Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A novel multi-metal binding biosorbent (MMBB) was developed by combining a group of three from the selective natural lignocellulosic agro-industrial wastes for effectively eliminating lead, cadmium, copper and zinc from aqueous solutions. Four MMBBs with different combinations (MMBB1: tea waste, corncob, sugarcane bagasse; MMBB2: tea waste, corncob and sawdust; MMBB3: tea waste, corncob and apple peel; MMBB4: tea waste, corncob and grape stalk) were evaluated. FTIR analysis for characterizing the MMBB2 explored that the MMBB2 contains more functional groups available for multi-metals binding. Comparing among the MMBBs as well as the single group biosorbents, MMBB2 was the best biosorbent with the maximum biosorption capacities of 41.48, 39.48, 94.00 and 27.23mg/g for Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II), respectively. After 5 times of desorption with CaCl2, CH3COOH and NaCl as eluent, the MMBB2 still remained excellent biosorptive capacity, so as it could be well regenerated for reuse and possible recovery of metals. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A breakthrough biosorbent in removing heavy metals: Equilibrium, kinetic, thermodynamic and mechanism analyses in a lab-scale study

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterization of a multi-metal binding biosorbent: Chemical modification and desorption studies

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treatment of lead-contaminated water using activated carbon adsorbent from locally available papaya peel biowaste

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdolali, A., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., Lee, D. J., Tung, K. L., & Wang, X. C. (2014). Development and evaluation of a new multi-metal binding biosorbent. Bioresource Technology, 160, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.038

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

63%

Researcher 10

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 20

38%

Environmental Science 14

26%

Chemistry 12

23%

Chemical Engineering 7

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free