Distinguishing cirrus cloud presence in autonomous lidar measurements

45Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

2012 Level-2 Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) satellite-based cloud data sets are investigated for thresholds that distinguish the presence of cirrus clouds in autonomous lidar measurements, based on temperatures, heights, optical depth and phase. A thermal threshold, proposed by Sassen and Campbell (2001) for cloud top temperature Ttop Currency sign g-37 °C, is evaluated versus CALIOP algorithms that identify ice-phase cloud layers using polarized backscatter measurements. Derived global mean cloud top heights (11.15 vs. 10.07 km above mean sea level; a.m.s.l.), base heights (8.76 km a.m.s.l. vs. 7.95 km a.m.s.l.), temperatures (g-58.48 °C vs. g-52.18 °C and g-42.40 °C vs. g-38.13 °C, respectively, for tops and bases) and optical depths (1.18 vs. 1.23) reflect the sensitivity to this constraint. Over 99 % of all Ttop Currency sign g-37 °C clouds are classified as ice by CALIOP Level-2 algorithms. Over 81 % of all ice clouds correspond with Ttop Currency sign g-37 °C. For instruments lacking polarized measurements, and thus practical estimates of phase, Ttop Currency sign g-37 °C provides sufficient justification for distinguishing cirrus, as opposed to the risks of glaciated liquid-water cloud contamination occurring in a given sample from clouds identified at relatively "warm" (Ttop > g-37 °C) temperatures. Although accounting for uncertainties in temperatures collocated with lidar data (i.e., model reanalyses/sondes) may justifiably relax the threshold to include warmer cases, the ambiguity of "warm" ice clouds cannot be fully reconciled with available measurements, conspicuously including phase. Cloud top heights and optical depths are investigated, and global distributions and frequencies derived, as functions of CALIOP-retrieved phase. These data provide little additional information, compared with temperature alone, and may exacerbate classification uncertainties overall.

References Powered by Scopus

The cloudsat mission and the A-Train: A new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation

1846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of cirrus clouds on weather and climate processes: a global perspective.

947Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate

932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database - Automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements

808Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version 4.1 data products

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Daytime cirrus cloud top-of-the-atmosphere radiative forcing properties at a midlatitude site and their global consequences

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campbell, J. R., Vaughan, M. A., Oo, M., Holz, R. E., Lewis, J. R., & Welton, E. J. (2015). Distinguishing cirrus cloud presence in autonomous lidar measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(1), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-435-2015

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

42%

Researcher 5

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

45%

Environmental Science 4

36%

Physics and Astronomy 1

9%

Engineering 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free