Diurnal temperature range over Europe between 1950 and 2005

141Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has been widely accepted that diurnal temperature range (DTR) decreased on a global scale during the second half of the twentieth century. Here we show however, that the long-term trend of annual DTR has reversed from a decrease to an increase during the 1970s in Western Europe and during the 1980s in Eastern Europe. The analysis is based on the high-quality dataset of the European Climate Assessment and Dataset Project, from which we selected approximately 200 stations covering the area bordered by Iceland, Algeria, Turkey and Russia for the period 1950 to 2005. We investigate national and regional annual means as well as the pan-European mean with respect to trends and reversal periods. 17 of the 24 investigated regions including the pan-European mean show a statistical significant increase of DTR since 1990 at the latest. Of the remaining 7 regions, two show a non-significant increase, three a significant decrease and two no significant trend. Changes in DTR are affected by both surface shortwave and longwave radiation, the former of which has undergone a change from dimming to brightening in the period considered. Consequently, we discuss the connections between DTR, shortwave radiation and sulfur emissions which are thought to be amongst the most important factors influencing the incoming solar radiation through the primary and secondary aerosol effect. We find reasonable agreement between trends in SO2 emissions, radiation and DTR in areas affected by high pollution. Consequently, we conclude that the trends in DTR could be mostly determined by changes in emissions and the associated changes in incoming solar radiation.

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Sketch of mean diurnal temperature (T ) cycle under (a) weak anthropogenic radiative influence, dominant radiative processes are denoted by arrows, (b) enhanced shortwave radiative cooling – “global dimming” (represented by the black arrows) and long-wave radiative warming (represented by the grey arrows), and (c) weakening shortwave radiative cooling – “global brightening” (thinner black arrows) and continued long-wave radiative warming. (DTR: diurnal temperature range; T-MAX/-MIN: daily mean maximum/minimum; T-MEAN: daily mean temperature, SW: shortwave, LW: longwave, 1T1/3: overall amount of warming from state (a) to (c) or e.g. 1950 to 1990 respectively).
  • Fig. 2. Time series of annual mean DTR for each investigated region. All y-axes are scaled to 3 degrees Celsius for a better comparability. Graphs are geographically arranged – except: surrounding regions of Europe as well as European mean are in the last row. The order of the best suitable polynomial trend model according to Table 1 is indicated in brackets next to the name of the region and the investigated period. Thick, grey, solid line presents 7 year running mean. The thick, black, dashed line shows the fitted trend model, if no black line is plotted none of the models was significant above the 90% level.FCZS – former Czechoslovakia, FRY – Former Republic of Yugoslavia.
  • Fig. 3. Distribution of statistical significant, fitted DTR trend models. Blue – linear (all trends are negative), red – second order (all trends show first a decrease, then an increase), green – third order (all trends show first an increase, then a decrease, then an increase) orange – forth order polynomial. Numbers are the year of reversal from decrease to increase in the 7 year running mean, derived from the annual mean DTR of region/country where denoted. The uncertainty of the actual year of reversal can be inferred from Fig. 4. The trend model is not significant (>90%) if the numbers are in brackets, consequently the investigated region is also not color-coded (Spain, Eastern-Germany, Benelux). Blue crosses represent stations investigated.
  • Table 1. Data for each investigated region, including overall Europe and each trend type. Order: Western Europe N–S; Eastern N–S, surrounding regions, Europe; Columns from left to right: (1) Name of the region, (2)R2 and significance codes for each coefficient (–: <90%, o: 90%–95%, x: 95%–99%, xx: 99%–99.999%, xxx: >99.999%), columns (3) to (5) equal to column (2) but for higher order polynomial fits, (6) number of stations for the mean calculations, and (7) data period (for more details see example in Appendix A1). R2’s in bold denote the best suitable model according to R2, significance and residuals (not shown), which was subsequently used in Fig. 2. FCZS – former Czechoslovakia, FRY – Former Republic of Yugoslavia.
  • Table 1. Continued.
  • Fig. 4. Reversal of 7 year running mean DTR trends. Diamonds represent the year of reversal of DTR as calculated from 7 year running mean trend. Dashed lines show additionally the period covered by values within the lowest 10% of the amplitude of maximum DTR minus minimum DTR (of seven year running mean values) for the period 1965–1995. For more details see example in Appendix A2. FCZS – former Czechoslovakia, FRY – Former Republic of Yugoslavia.
  • Fig. 5. Time series of annual mean DTR and SO2 emissions. Eleven-year running means of DTR, expressed as relative (rel.) deviations from the 1971–2000 mean, are plotted as solid black line. Differently weighted first and last five years of the time series are denoted as dashed black lines. SO2 emissions from Mylona (1996) (2) and Vestreng et al. (2007) (2) were plotted up side down, to indicate the presumed forcing. Estimated sulfur emissions from Lefohn et al. (1996) (3) were converted to SO2 equivalent and also plotted upside down. All SO2 estimates are expressed in megatons per year.
  • Fig. 6. As Fig. 5. In addition, sunshine duration series from Sanchez-Lorenzo et al. (2008) (4) and Sanchez-Lorenzo et al. (2007) (5) are plotted as solid grey line. Plotted data are low-pass filtered values (11-year window 3 year σ Gaussian low-pass filter) expresses as relative deviations from the 1961–1990 mean.

References Powered by Scopus

Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe

1423Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment

1407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From dimming to brightening: Decadal changes in solar radiation at earth's surface

1131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Observations: Atmosphere and surface

1695Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review on Estimation of Land Surface Radiation and Energy Budgets From Ground Measurement, Remote Sensing and Model Simulations

316Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of urbanization and land-use/land-cover change on diurnal temperature range: A case study of tropical urban airshed of India using remote sensing data

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Makowski, K., Wild, M., & Ohmura, A. (2008). Diurnal temperature range over Europe between 1950 and 2005. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8(21), 6483–6498. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6483-2008

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

53%

Researcher 30

39%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 33

49%

Environmental Science 19

28%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

15%

Engineering 5

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0