East Asian Monsoon controls on the inter-annual variability in precipitation isotope ratio in Japan

32Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To elucidate the mechanism for how the East Asian Monsoon (EAM) variability have influenced the isotope proxy records in Japan, we explore the primary driver of variations of precipitation isotopes at multiple temporal scales (event, seasonal and inter-annual scales). Using a new 1-year record of the isotopic composition of event-based precipitation and continuous near-surface water vapor at Nagoya in central Japan, we identify the key atmospheric processes controlling the storm-to-storm isotopic variations through an analysis of air mass sources and rainout history during the transport of moisture to the site, and then apply the identified processes to explain the inter-annual isotopic variability related to the EAM variability in the historical 17-year long Tokyo station record in the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP). In the summer, southerly flows transport moisture with higher isotopic values from subtropical marine regions and bring warm rainfall enriched with heavy isotopes. The weak monsoon summer corresponds to enriched isotopic values in precipitation, reflecting higher contribution of warm rainfall to the total summer precipitation. In the strong monsoon summer, the sustaining Baiu rainband along the southern coast of Japan prevents moisture transport across Japan, so that the contribution of warm rainfall is reduced. In the winter, storm tracks are the dominant driver of storm-to-storm isotopic variation and relatively low isotopic values occur when a cold frontal rainband associated with extratropical cyclones passes off to the south of the Japan coast. The weak monsoon winter is characterized by lower isotopes in precipitation, due to the distribution of the cyclone tracks away from the southern coast of Japan. In contrast, the northward shift of the cyclone tracks and stronger development of cyclones during the strong monsoon winters decrease the contribution of cold frontal precipitation, resulting in higher isotopic values in winter precipitation. Therefore, year-to-year isotopic variability in summer and winter Japanese precipitation correlates significantly with changes in the East Asian summer and winter monsoon intensity (R = -0.47 for summer, R = 0.42 for winter), and thus we conclude that the isotope proxy records in Japan should reflect past changes in the East Asian Monsoon. Since our study identifies the climate drivers controlling isotopic variations in summer and winter precipitation, we highlight the retrieval of a record with seasonal resolution from paleoarchives as an important priority.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Climatological fields of precipitation (shading), sea level pressure (solid contours, contour interval 4 hPa) and surface wind (vectors: ms−1) for East Asia during (a) summer (JJA) and (b) winter (DJF). The symbols H and L are centers of high and low surface air pressure, respectively. The dotted box represents the East Asian monsoon region defined by Ding and Chan (2005).
  • Figure 2. Seasonal mean field of vertically averaged (850–925 hPa) equivalent potential temperatures 〈θe〉 (shading over the oceans: K) during (a) summer (JJA) and (b) winter (DJF). The black circle represents the observation site locations (Nagoya and Tokyo). The solid black lines represent typical cyclone tracks (southern coastal cyclone and Japan Sea cyclone) over the Japan archipelago during winter. The red and blue arrows represent the warm conveyor belt (WCB), and the cold conveyor belt (CCB), respectively.
  • Figure 3. Time series of isotopic values and surface meteorological variables at Nagoya in Japan for the period of June 2013 to June 2014 (summer: shaded in light yellow; winter: shaded in sky blue). (a) δD in precipitation (bar) and surface vapor measured by the laser instrument (green line) and by the conventional cold trap method (red line). The black cross represents the calculated δD of vapor in isotopic equilibrium with precipitation at surface air temperature. The pink-colored bars represent rainfall from Nangan cyclones. (b) The d-excess in precipitation and surface vapor measured by the cold trap method. (c) Air temperature, (d) mixing ratio and (e) precipitation observed at the nearest meteorological station. The “TY” at the top of the figure corresponds to the passage of a typhoon at the observation site.
  • Figure 4. Histograms of (upper panel) δD and (lower panel) δ18O values in event-based precipitation. The black line represents the annual mean value weighted by precipitation amount. Blue and red arrows correspond to the winter (DJFM) and summer (JJAS) mean value. The numbers on each bar in the top figure represent average precipitation amount at each bin.
  • Figure 5. Time series of the value of δD in surface vapor observed at Nagoya University (gray line) and vertically averaged (850–925 hPa) equivalent potential temperatures 〈θe〉 (K) between 25 ◦ N and 45◦ N along 135◦ E during summer (JJAS) in 2013. The labeled W’s (C’s) represent the value of δD in surface vapor in equilibrium with warm (cold) type precipitation at the same site.
  • Figure 6. Relationships between δD values in individual precipitation events and cumulative precipitation amount (Pcumul) over 9 h back trajectories of the air mass launched from the observation site in (a) summer (from June to October) and (b) winter (December to March). Symbols indicate each different precipitation type (see detail in the text). Inset: variation in the correlation coefficient (R2) for δD-Pcumul relationship with variation in the period of accumulation. The highest R2 values were observed with 9 h of cumulative precipitation in summer.
  • Figure 7. Same as Fig. 5, but represents the time series for the winter (DJFM) season. The labeled characters (J, I, S, O) represent the type of precipitation event as follows: J, Japan Sea-type; I, Intermediate-type; S, southern coastal-type; and O, others-type.
  • Figure 8. Time series of seasonal average data for the period 1961 to 1979. (a) Precipitation-weighted δ18O in summer (June–September) precipitation at Tokyo station and the ratio of the warm rainfall to the total summer precipitation RWR. (b) The RWR anomaly during boreal summer (June–August) and the Bonin High index (BHI) normalized by standard deviation. (c) The total summer precipitation amount at a meteorological station located near the GNIP Tokyo station. (d) Same as (a), but for winter (December–March) precipitation and for the ratio of the southern coastal cyclone to total winter precipitation RS-type. (e) Same as (b), but for RS-type anomaly during winter and for East Asian Winter Monsoon index (EAWMI). (f) Same as (c), but for winter precipitation.

References Powered by Scopus

A high-resolution absolute-dated late pleistocene monsoon record from Hulu Cave, China

2744Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monsoons: processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction

2556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The holocene Asian monsoon: Links to solar changes and North Atlantic climate

2230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stable isotopes in atmospheric water vapor and applications to the hydrologic cycle

299Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stable isotopes of atmospheric precipitation and its environmental drivers in the Eastern Chinese Loess Plateau, China

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Data Descriptor: Daily observations of stable isotope ratios of rainfall in the tropics

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurita, N., Fujiyoshi, Y., Nakayama, T., Matsumi, Y., & Kitagawa, H. (2015). East Asian Monsoon controls on the inter-annual variability in precipitation isotope ratio in Japan. Climate of the Past, 11(2), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-339-2015

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

58%

Researcher 10

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 22

63%

Environmental Science 12

34%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0