Evaluating the surface circulation in the Ebro delta (northeastern Spain) with quality-controlled high-frequency radar measurements

25Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Ebro River delta is a relevant marine protected area in the western Mediterranean. In order to promote the conservation of its ecosystem and support operational decision making in this sensitive area, a three-site standard-range (13.5 MHz) CODAR SeaSonde high-frequency (HF) radar was deployed in December 2013. The main goal of this work is to explore basic features of the sea surface circulation in the Ebro deltaic region as derived from reliable HF radar surface current measurements. For this aim, a combined quality control methodology was applied: firstly, 1-year long (2014) real-time web monitoring of nonvelocity-based diagnostic parameters was conducted to infer both radar site status and HF radar system performance. The signal-to-noise ratio at the monopole exhibited a consistent monthly evolution, although some abrupt decreases (below 10 dB), occasionally detected in June for one of the radar sites, impacted negatively on the spatiotemporal coverage of total current vectors. It seemed to be sporadic episodes since radar site overall performance was found to be robust during 2014. Secondly, a validation of HF radar data with independent in situ observations from a moored current meter was attempted for May-October 2014. The accuracy assessment of radial and total vectors revealed a consistently high agreement. The directional accuracy of the HF radar was rated at better than 8°. The correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) values emerged in the ranges [0.58-0.83] and [4.02-18.31] cm s-1, respectively. The analysis of the monthly averaged current maps for 2014 showed that the HF radar properly represented basic oceanographic features previously reported, namely, the predominant southwestward flow, the coastal clockwise eddy confined south of the Ebro delta mouth, or the Ebro River impulsive-type freshwater discharge. The EOF analysis related the flow response to local wind forcing and confirmed that the surface current field evolved in space and time according to three significantly dominant modes of variability.

Figures

  • Figure 1. (a) HF coastal radar network currently operated by Puertos del Estado; (b) HF radar deployed at the Ebro delta, composed of three sites: Salou (SALO), Alfacada (ALFA) and Vinaroz (VINA). Colored dots denote the temporal coverage in percent of HF radar surface current total vectors for the entire year of 2014. Isobath depths are labeled every 200 m. The location of the Tarragona buoy (B1) is marked with filled blue squares. HFR1 denotes the radar grid point closest to the B1 position. (c) Timelines of HF radar sites (red) and B1 buoy (blue) current data availability for 2014.
  • Table 1. Diagnosed parameters used to operationally monitor Ebro delta HF radar status in real time. The HF radar system’s performance is routinely evaluated through the analysis of the indicators listed below at different frequencies (daily/weekly/monthly).
  • Figure 2. Annual quality control of Ebro delta radar sites, SALO (a), ALFA (b) and VINA (c), based on monthly boxplots of the signal-to-noise ratio at the monopole (SNR3) for 2014. In each box, the central mark is the median, the edges of the box are the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points. (d) Annual time series of hourly SNR3 values for the VINA site. (e) Monthly time series of hourly radial vectors provided by the VINA site during June 2014. The solid and dashed blue lines represent the mean and the standard deviation for the entire 2014, respectively. The bold blue dotted lines denote the thresholds of 2 standard deviations above/below the mean.
  • Figure 3. Evaluation of Ebro delta HF radar system performance on a monthly basis: February (left) and June (right) 2014. A comparative analysis is carried out for the radar data availability (a–b), the temporal evolution of the spatial coverage (c–d) and the relationship between both the spatial and temporal coverage (e–f). The black square represented in (a–b) denotes the B1 buoy location.
  • Figure 5. Comparison of low-pass filtered hourly time series (cutoff period of 30 h) of radial currents measured by B1 buoy (blue line) and HF radar sites (red lines): (a) SALO, (b) ALFA and (c) VINA in the range arc point closest to the B1 location for a 6-month period May–October 2014, using calibrated antenna patterns. N , slope and intercept represent the number of hourly radial current observations and the results derived from the best linear fits, respectively.
  • Figure 4. (a) Angular position of Ebro delta HF radar sites with respect to the B1 buoy location. Angle values are measured counterclockwise from east, indicating arc limits and buoy direction. (b–d) Correlation (solid line) and RMSE (dashed line) between unfiltered radial currents estimated by the B1 buoy and those measured by three HF radar sites, SALO (b), ALFA (c), and VINA (d), using calibrated antenna patterns for a 6-month period May–October 2014. The vertical dotted line represents the angular position of B1. The vertical red solid line denotes the angular position of maximum correlation (CORR), which is gathered with the associated RMSE and bearing offset (1α) values.
  • Figure 6. Low-pass filtered (cut-off period of 30 h) hourly time series of zonal (a) and meridional (b) components of total currents measured by the B1 buoy (blue line) and HF radar at the closest grid point HFR1 (red line), for a 6-month period May–October 2014. Mean zonal (c) and meridional (d) current velocities, averaged over individual months for both HF radar and B1 measurements, with 1 standard deviation (error bars represent the 95 % confidence interval).
  • Figure 7. Taylor diagrams, based on the law of cosines, provide a concise statistical summary of how closely unfiltered hourly radar estimations (red filled squares) match with B1 observations (blue filled squares), considered here as the reference points of perfect agreement. Taylor diagrams for zonal (a) and meridional (b) velocity components gather the monthly statistical metrics derived from HF radar–B1 comparison. Sequential numbers refer to individual months of the analyzed period May–October 2014 (1: May; 6: October).

References Powered by Scopus

MULTIPLE EMITTER LOCATION AND SIGNAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION.

11717Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram

6452Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Doppler spectrum of sea echo at 13.56 Mc./s. [3]

547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

HF Radar activity in European coastal seas: Next steps toward a Pan-European HF Radar network

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Copernicus Marine Service Ocean State Report, Issue 4

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changes in Life History Traits of Small Pelagic Fish in the Western Mediterranean Sea

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lorente, P., Piedracoba, S., Soto-Navarro, J., & Alvarez-Fanjul, E. (2015). Evaluating the surface circulation in the Ebro delta (northeastern Spain) with quality-controlled high-frequency radar measurements. Ocean Science, 11(6), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-921-2015

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 5

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 8

40%

Environmental Science 5

25%

Engineering 4

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0