Event-driven deposition of snow on the Antarctic Plateau: Analyzing field measurements with SNOWPACK

64Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Antarctic surface snow has been studied by means of continuous measurements and observations over a period of 3 yr at Dome C. Snow observations include solid deposits in form of precipitation, diamond dust, or hoar, snow temperatures at several depths, records of deposition and erosion on the surface, and snow profiles. Together with meteorological data from automatic weather stations, this forms a unique dataset of snow conditions on the Antarctic Plateau. Large differences in snow amounts and density exist between solid deposits measured 1 m above the surface and deposition at the surface. We used the snow-cover model SNOWPACK to simulate the snow-cover evolution for different deposition parameterizations. The main adaptation of the model described here is a new event-driven deposition scheme. The scheme assumes that snow is added to the snow cover permanently only during periods of strong winds. This assumption followed from the comparison between observations of solid deposits and daily records of changes in snow height: solid deposits could be observed on tables 1 m above the surface on 94 out of 235 days (40%) while deposition at the surface occurred on 59 days (25%) during the same period, but both happened concurrently on 33 days (14%) only. This confirms that precipitation is not necessarily the driving force behind non-temporary snow height changes. A comparison of simulated snow height to stake farm measurements over 3 yr showed that we underestimate the total accumulation by at least 33%, when the total snow deposition is constrained by the measurements of solid deposits on tables 1 m above the surface. During shorter time periods, however, we may miss over 50% of the deposited mass. This suggests that the solid deposits measured above the surface and used to drive the model, even though comparable to ECMWF forecasts in its total magnitude, should be seen as a lower boundary. As a result of the new deposition mechanism, we found a good agreement between model results and measurements of snow temperatures and recorded snow profiles. In spite of the underestimated deposition, the results thus suggest that we can obtain quite realistic simulations of the Antarctic snow cover by the introduction of event-driven snow deposition. © 2013 Author(s).

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Top: plan of the immediate surroundings of Concordia research station indicating all measurement sites. The measurement site “Surface boards” includes the surface boards SBacc and SBclear and the tables used for measurements of solid deposits. Bottom: map of Antarctica indicating Dome C.
  • Fig. 2. Relative frequency distribution of the measured density of solid deposits (254 measurements, March 2005–March 2009) and surface snow down to a depth of 10 cm (128 measurements, May 2008–March 2009).
  • Fig. 3. Temperature term of the viscosity according to the current formulation (Eq. 5), the previous parameterization (Eq. 6) and a pure Arrhenius term as described in Sect. 3.3. The new temperature dependence of viscosity results in stiffer snow at low temperatures while nearing the melting point a more pronounced temperature dependence than both the other parameterizations is achieved (see insert).
  • Table 1. Description of the terms (Qi ) in Eq. (7). The coefficient values correspond to the standard SNOWPACK implementation (release 3.0.0).
  • Table 2. All simulations performed to test the adaptations made to SNOWPACK. We define each simulation and summarize how snow density of new snow was initialized, if the snow was deposited at time of measurement or in events (Sect. 3.1) and if additional surface compaction (Sect. 3.2) was activated.
  • Fig. 4. Height of solid deposits (mm) measured daily either on a table 1 m above the surface or at the surface on a daily cleared snow board (SBclear), and change of snow height 1HS over an untouched snow board (SBacc). Top: 18–23 November 2008; middle: 18 November 2008–July 2009, board SBclear not shown. Bottom: 100-h moving average wind speed (Uevent, m s−1) in black, 18 November 2008–July 2009. The grey line represents the minimum wind speed (4 m s−1) necessary for an event (see Sect. 3.1).
  • Fig. 5. Height of snowpack (m) relative to the snow layer which was at the surface on 15 February 2006. Stake measurements are indicated by crosses, and lines represent results from SNOWPACK simulations using as input either the measured density of solid deposits (“ρn,measured”), a fixed density of 320 kg m −3 (“ρn,320”), both at precipitation time, or the event-driven mechanism without (”ρ(Uevent)”) or with additional compaction due to wind at the surface (“ρ(Uevent)+SfcComp”).
  • Fig. 6. Observed (Obs) and simulated (Sim) snow surface temperature Tsfc and snow temperature T10cm at 10-cm depth, 19 February–20 March 2008. The two upper panels relate to the simulation “ρn,measured”, the two lower ones to the event-driven simulation ”ρ(Uevent)+SfcComp”, that is, with additional wind densification at the surface.

References Powered by Scopus

Evaluating the use of 'goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation

3640Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2

450Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part II. Snow microstructure

414Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clouds enhance Greenland ice sheet meltwater runoff

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Observing and Modeling Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coping with difficult weather and snow conditions: Reindeer herders' views on climate change impacts and coping strategies

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Cagnati, A., Crepaz, A., Fierz, C., MacElloni, G., Valt, M., & Lehning, M. (2013). Event-driven deposition of snow on the Antarctic Plateau: Analyzing field measurements with SNOWPACK. Cryosphere, 7(1), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-333-2013

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

63%

Researcher 10

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 31

74%

Environmental Science 8

19%

Physics and Astronomy 2

5%

Computer Science 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0