Fossil vs. non-fossil sources of fine carbonaceous aerosols in four Chinese cities during the extreme winter haze episode of 2013

180Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During winter 2013, extremely high concentrations (i.e., 4-20 times higher than the World Health Organization guideline) of PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 I1/4m) mass concentrations (24 h samples) were found in four major cities in China including Xi'an, Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Statistical analysis of a combined data set from elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), 14C and biomass-burning marker measurements using Latin hypercube sampling allowed a quantitative source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols. Based on 14C measurements of EC fractions (six samples each city), we found that fossil emissions from coal combustion and vehicle exhaust dominated EC with a mean contribution of 75 ± 8% across all sites. The remaining 25 ± 8% was exclusively attributed to biomass combustion, consistent with the measurements of biomass-burning markers such as anhydrosugars (levoglucosan and mannosan) and water-soluble potassium (K+). With a combination of the levoglucosan-to-mannosan and levoglucosan-to-K+ ratios, the major source of biomass burning in winter in China is suggested to be combustion of crop residues. The contribution of fossil sources to OC was highest in Beijing (58 ± 5%) and decreased from Shanghai (49 ± 2%) to Xi'an (38 ± 3%) and Guangzhou (35 ± 7%). Generally, a larger fraction of fossil OC was from secondary origins than primary sources for all sites. Non-fossil sources accounted on average for 55 ± 10 and 48 ± 9% of OC and total carbon (TC), respectively, which suggests that non-fossil emissions were very important contributors of urban carbonaceous aerosols in China. The primary biomass-burning emissions accounted for 40 ± 8, 48 ± 18, 53 ± 4 and 65 ± 26% of non-fossil OC for Xi'an, Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, respectively. Other non-fossil sources excluding primary biomass burning were mainly attributed to formation of secondary organic carbon (SOC) from non-fossil precursors such as biomass-burning emissions. For each site, we also compared samples from moderately to heavily polluted days according to particulate matter mass. Despite a significant increase of the absolute mass concentrations of primary emissions from both fossil and non-fossil sources during the heavily polluted events, their relative contribution to TC was even decreased, whereas the portion of SOC was consistently increased at all sites. This observation indicates that SOC was an important fraction in the increment of carbonaceous aerosols during the haze episode in China.

References Powered by Scopus

Positive matrix factorization: A non‐negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values

4675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China

3966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Air pollution in mega cities in China

2328Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) in China at a city level

849Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chemical composition, sources, and aging process of submicron aerosols in Beijing: Contrast between summer and winter

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating premature mortality attributable to PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure and benefit of air pollution control policies in China for 2020

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Y. L., Huang, R. J., El Haddad, I., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y., … Szidat, S. (2015). Fossil vs. non-fossil sources of fine carbonaceous aerosols in four Chinese cities during the extreme winter haze episode of 2013. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(3), 1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1299-2015

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

59%

Researcher 23

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 46

57%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 15

19%

Chemistry 13

16%

Engineering 6

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0