A general treatment of snow microstructure exemplified by an improved relation for thermal conductivity

62Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Finding relevant microstructural parameters beyond density is a longstanding problem which hinders the formulation of accurate parameterizations of physical properties of snow. Towards a remedy, we address the effective thermal conductivity tensor of snow via anisotropic, second-order bounds. The bound provides an explicit expression for the thermal conductivity and predicts the relevance of a microstructural anisotropy parameter Q, which is given by an integral over the two-point correlation function and unambiguously defined for arbitrary snow structures. For validation we compiled a comprehensive data set of 167 snow samples. The set comprises individual samples of various snow types and entire time series of metamorphism experiments under isothermal and temperature gradient conditions. All samples were digitally reconstructed by micro-computed tomography to perform microstructure-based simulations of heat transport. The incorporation of anisotropy via Q considerably reduces the root mean square error over the usual density-based parameterization. The systematic quantification of anisotropy via the two-point correlation function suggests a generalizable route to incorporate microstructure into snowpack models. We indicate the inter-relation of the conductivity to other properties and outline a potential impact of Q on dielectric constant, permeability and adsorption rate of diffusing species in the pore space. © 2013 Author(s).

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Simulated vertical conductivity ke,z as a function of volume fraction and best quadratic fit (black line, R2 = 0.89).
  • Fig. 3. Comparison of the simulated vertical conductivity to the bound-based model Eq. (5). Deviations from the 1 : 1 correspondence (black line) yield R2 = 0.96. The inset shows the best fit coefficients in Eq. (5) obtained for different α.
  • Fig. 2. Simulated conductivity (arithmetically averaged) as a function of volume fraction and best quadratic fit (black line, R2 = 0.95). Red line: fit obtained by Calonne et al. (2011)
  • Fig. 4. Comparison of the bound-based model Eq. (5) with simulations for one metamorphism time series (TGM-17). The inset shows the evolution of the parameters Q and φi .
  • Fig. 5. Distribution of microstructural parameters in the (φi ,Q) plane. The dashed line Q= 1/3 indicates isotropy.
  • Fig. 6. Comparison of the simulated horizontal conductivity to the bound-based model Eq. (6). Deviations from the 1 : 1 correspondence (black line) yield R2 = 0.91. The inset shows the best fit coefficients in Eq. (6) obtained for different α.

References Powered by Scopus

Snow avalanche formation

507Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The thermal conductivity of seasonal snow

503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Linking snowpack microphysics and albedo evolution

313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Density, specific surface area, and correlation length of snow measured by high-resolution penetrometry

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Snow height determination by polarimetric phase differences in X-Band SAR Data

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SMRT: An active-passive microwave radiative transfer model for snow with multiple microstructure and scattering formulations (v1.0)

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Löwe, H., Riche, F., & Schneebeli, M. (2013). A general treatment of snow microstructure exemplified by an improved relation for thermal conductivity. Cryosphere, 7(5), 1473–1480. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1473-2013

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

71%

Researcher 9

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 27

59%

Engineering 8

17%

Environmental Science 8

17%

Materials Science 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0