Genetic variants in antioxidant genes are associated with sperm DNA damage and risk of male infertility in a Chinese population

55Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that polymorphisms in antioxidant genes are more susceptible to sperm DNA damage and male infertility, we examined 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from six antioxidant genes (GPX1, CAT, PON1, NQO1, SOD2/MnSOD, and SOD3) in 580 infertility cases and 580 controls from a Chinese population-based case-control study (NJMU Infertility Study). Genotypes were determined using the OpenArray platform. Sperm DNA fragmentation was detected using the Tdt-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay, and the level of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in sperm DNA was measured using immunofluorescence. The adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. The results indicated that the PON1 Arg192Glu (rs662) and SOD2 Val16Ala (rs4880) variant genotypes were associated with a significantly higher risk of male infertility. In addition, subjects carrying variant genotypes of both loci had a twofold (95% CI, 1.42-2.90) increase in the risk of male infertility, indicating a significant gene-gene interaction between these two loci (P for multiplicative interaction = 0.045). Moreover, linear regression analysis showed that individuals carrying the PON1 Arg192Glu (rs662) or SOD2 Val16Ala (rs4880) variants have significantly higher levels of sperm DNA fragmentation and 8-OHdG. These data suggest that genetic variations in antioxidant genes may contribute to oxidative sperm DNA damage and male infertility. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ji, G., Gu, A., Wang, Y., Huang, C., Hu, F., Zhou, Y., … Wang, X. (2012). Genetic variants in antioxidant genes are associated with sperm DNA damage and risk of male infertility in a Chinese population. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 52(4), 775–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.11.032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free