Global retrieval of ATSR cloud parameters and evaluation (GRAPE): Dataset assessment

28Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Along-Track Scanning Radiometers (ATSRs) provide a long time-series of measurements suitable for the retrieval of cloud properties. This work evaluates the freely-available Global Retrieval of ATSR Cloud Parameters and Evaluation (GRAPE) dataset (version 3) created from the ATSR-2 (1995-2003) and Advanced ATSR (AATSR; 2002 onwards) records. Users are recommended to consider only retrievals flagged as high-quality, where there is a good consistency between the measurements and the retrieved state (corresponding to about 60% of converged retrievals over sea, and more than 80% over land). Cloud properties are found to be generally free of any significant spurious trends relating to satellite zenith angle. Estimates of the random error on retrieved cloud properties are suggested to be generally appropriate for optically-thick clouds, and up to a factor of two too small for optically-thin cases. The correspondence between ATSR-2 and AATSR cloud properties is high, but a relative calibration difference between the sensors of order 5-10% at 660 nm and 870 nm limits the potential of the current version of the dataset for trend analysis. As ATSR-2 is thought to have the better absolute calibration, the discussion focusses on this portion of the record. Cloud-top heights from GRAPE compare well to ground-based data at four sites, particularly for shallow clouds. Clouds forming in boundary-layer inversions are typically around 1 km too high in GRAPE due to poorly-resolved inversions in the modelled temperature profiles used. Global cloud fields are compared to satellite products derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) measurements, and a climatology of liquid water content derived from satellite microwave radiometers. In all cases the main reasons for differences are linked to differing sensitivity to, and treatment of, multi-layer cloud systems. The correlation coefficient between GRAPE and the two MODIS products considered is generally high (greater than 0.7 for most cloud properties), except for liquid and ice cloud effective radius, which also show biases between the datasets. For liquid clouds, part of the difference is linked to choice of wavelengths used in the retrieval. Total cloud cover is slightly lower in GRAPE (0.64) than the CALIOP dataset (0.66). GRAPE underestimates liquid cloud water path relative to microwave radiometers by up to 100 gmg-2 near the Equator and overestimates by around 50gm -2 in the storm tracks. Finally, potential future improvements to the algorithm are outlined. © 2011 Author(s).

Figures

  • Table 1. Retrieved state vector (and derived) quantities, units, acronyms and symbols used in this work. The first five quantities are retrieved, along with the cloud phase (ice/water), and the final three derived. Note that the COD is retrieved in log10 space.
  • Table 2. Classification of quality flags in GRAPE level 2 products.
  • Fig. 1. Cumulative frequency distributions of retrieval costs. Solid lines indicate water cloud and dashed ice; green lines indicate cloud over land, and blue over sea. The solid black line corresponds to a theoretical χ2 distribution with 1.4 d grees of freedom.
  • Fig. 2. Regional performance of cloud retrieval. From left to right are shown the fraction of attempted retrievals converging with cost of 10 or less (QF=3); the fraction converging with a cost over 10; and the fraction failing to converge.
  • Fig. 3. Joint histograms of quality controlled and colocated ATSR-2 and AATSR cloud properties over land (top row) and sea (second row). From left to right, the columns show the base-10 logarithm of cloud optical depth; the cloud effective radius; and the cloud-top pressure. The colour scale indicates the number of retrievals in each bin. Bottom row: Histograms of the difference (AATSR−ATSR-2) between bin mean retrieved cloud properties, divided by the root sum of the bin variances for that cloud property. This gives a normalised (unitless) quantity. The plots are ordered as in the top row. Black lines indicate retrievals over land, and red over sea. Dashed lines indicate 0, ±1 and ±3.
  • Fig. 4. Variability of the median ratio betweeen AATSR and ATSR-2 measurements (Sun-normalised radiance or brightness temperature, as appropriate) for quality controlled and colocated cloud retrievals during the 2002– 2003 overlap year. Results are shown for (from top-bottom) 660 nm, 870 nm, 1.6 µm, 10.8 µm, and 12 µm. Solid lines indicate land, and dashed lines ocean. Red lines indicate the Northern Hemisphere, and blue the southern. Error bars show the standard error.
  • Fig. 5. Joint histograms of retrieval standard deviation and mean uncertainty estimate for clouds at sea gridded to 0.5 degree resolution. From top to bottom, rows show the cloud optical depth, cloud effective radius, and cloud-top pressure. From left to right, columns show optically-thin liquid water clouds (τc < 10), optically-thick liquid water clouds (τc ≥ 10), optically-thin ice clouds (τc < 10), and optically-thick ice clouds (τc ≥ 10). The total number of retrievals for a given cloud type is indicated at the top of the column. White indicates bins containing no data.
  • Fig. 6. As Fig. 5, except for clouds over land.

References Powered by Scopus

The ERA-40 re-analysis

6156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS

2100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Radiative forcing and climate response

1769Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessment of global cloud datasets from satellites: Project and database initiated by the GEWEX radiation panel

489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

328Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of seven European aerosol optical depth retrieval algorithms for climate analysis

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sayer, A. M., Poulsen, C. A., Arnold, C., Campmany, E., Dean, S., Ewen, G. B. L., … Watts, P. D. (2011). Global retrieval of ATSR cloud parameters and evaluation (GRAPE): Dataset assessment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(8), 3913–3936. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3913-2011

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 10

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

35%

Environmental Science 6

30%

Chemistry 4

20%

Physics and Astronomy 3

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0