Hitting rock bottom: Morphological responses of bedrock-confined streams to a catastrophic flood

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The role of extreme events in shaping the Earth's surface is one that has held the interests of Earth scientists for centuries. A catastrophic flood in a tectonically quiescent setting in eastern Australia in 2011 provides valuable insight into how semi-alluvial channels respond to such events. Field survey data (3 reaches) and desktop analyses (10 reaches) with catchment areas ranging from 0.5 to 168 km2 show that the predicted discharge for the 2011 event ranged from 415 to 933 m3 s-1, with unit stream power estimates of up to 1077 W m-2. Estimated entrainment relationships predict the mobility of the entire grain-size population, and field data suggest the localised mobility of boulders up to 4.8 m in diameter. Analysis of repeat lidar data demonstrates that all reaches (field and desktop) were areas of net degradation via extensive scouring of coarse-grained alluvium with a strong positive relationship between catchment area and normalised erosion (R2 Combining double low line 0.72-0.74). The extensive scouring in the 2011 flood decreased thalweg variance significantly removing previous step pools and other coarse-grained in-channel units, forming lengths of plane-bed (cobble) reach morphology. This was also accompanied by the exposure of planar bedrock surfaces, marginal bedrock straths and bedrock steps. Post-flood field data indicate a slight increase in thalweg variance as a result of the smaller 2013 flood rebuilding the alluvial overprint with pool-riffle formation. However, the current form and distribution of channel morphological units does not conform to previous classifications of bedrock or headwater river systems. This variation in post-flood form indicates that in semi-alluvial systems extreme events are significant for re-setting the morphology of in-channel units and for exposing the underlying lithology to ongoing erosion.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Idealised long profile downslope through the channel network showing distribution of channel types and controls on channel processes (from Montgomery and Buffington, 1997).
  • Figure 2. (a) Location of the Lockyer Valley catchment in southeast Queensland, Australia, including the location of the two gauges used in the study (stars): Spring Bluff (SB) and Helidon (H) and location of the study area (boxed region). (b) Study area in the upper valley showing the three main creeks utilised in the field study.
  • Table 1. Flood characteristics of the 2011 flood, showing calculated flash flood magnitude index (FFMI; standard deviation of the log10 of the annual maximum series) and the average recurrence interval (ARI) for the 2011 event for data up to 2010 and 2013 inclusive; 2010 values from Thompson and Croke (2013). Qp: maximum recorded flow; MAF: mean annual flow. See Fig. 2 for gauge locations.
  • Table 2. Reach characteristics and calculated discharge, stream power and shear stress for the 2011 flood in each of the three field reaches.
  • Table 3. Results of flow competence equations for the 2011 flood; bold values indicate that sediment entrainment is not predicted. τc: critical shear stress (N m−2); qci: critical unit discharge for the movement of particles of size D.
  • Figure 3. Photographs of large particles mobilised in the 2011 flood event. (a) Boulder bar at Fifteen Mile Creek (Fig. 2) with D50 of 2325 mm. (b) Large boulder with b axis of 4820 mm at Paradise Creek (Fig. 2).
  • Figure 4. (a) Pre-flood (2010) and (b) post-flood (2011) photography of Paradise Creek (Fig. 2) in the upper Lockyer Valley, showing catastrophic channel stripping and widening.
  • Figure 5. Longitudinal profiles of the three field sites: (a) Paradise Creek, (b) Fifteen Mile Creek and (c) Murphys Creek. Derived from 2010 and 2011 lidar (pre- and post-2011 flood) and 2013 normalised DGPS thalweg profile (post-2013 flood). Dashed black line represents average water surface profile for the January 2011 flood based on DGPS elevations of flood marks. Grey shaded bars in each profile highlight exhumation of bedrock steps in the 2011 flood.

References Powered by Scopus

A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material

1815Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins

1578Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: Improved sediment budgets

908Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stormy geomorphology: geomorphic contributions in an age of climate extremes

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prioritising the placement of riparian vegetation to reduce flood risk and end-of-catchment sediment yields: Important considerations in hydrologically-variable regions

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reducing uncertainty with flood frequency analysis: The contribution of paleoflood and historical flood information

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sargood, M. B., Cohen, T. J., Thompson, C. J., & Croke, J. (2015). Hitting rock bottom: Morphological responses of bedrock-confined streams to a catastrophic flood. Earth Surface Dynamics, 3(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-265-2015

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 14

54%

Environmental Science 9

35%

Arts and Humanities 2

8%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0