Identification of key regulators of pancreatic cancer progression through multidimensional systems-level analysis

46Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive cancer with dismal prognosis, urgently necessitating better biomarkers to improve therapeutic options and early diagnosis. Traditional approaches of biomarker detection that consider only one aspect of the biological continuum like gene expression alone are limited in their scope and lack robustness in identifying the key regulators of the disease. We have adopted a multidimensional approach involving the cross-talk between the omics spaces to identify key regulators of disease progression. Methods: Multidimensional domain-specific disease signatures were obtained using rank-based meta-analysis of individual omics profiles (mRNA, miRNA, DNA methylation) related to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These domain-specific PDAC signatures were integrated to identify genes that were affected across multiple dimensions of omics space in PDAC (genes under multiple regulatory controls, GMCs). To further pin down the regulators of PDAC pathophysiology, a systems-level network was generated from knowledge-based interaction information applied to the above identified GMCs. Key regulators were identified from the GMC network based on network statistics and their functional importance was validated using gene set enrichment analysis and survival analysis. Results: Rank-based meta-analysis identified 5391 genes, 109 miRNAs and 2081 methylation-sites significantly differentially expressed in PDAC (false discovery rate ≤ 0.05). Bimodal integration of meta-analysis signatures revealed 1150 and 715 genes regulated by miRNAs and methylation, respectively. Further analysis identified 189 altered genes that are commonly regulated by miRNA and methylation, hence considered GMCs. Systems-level analysis of the scale-free GMCs network identified eight potential key regulator hubs, namely E2F3, HMGA2, RASA1, IRS1, NUAK1, ACTN1, SKI and DLL1, associated with important pathways driving cancer progression. Survival analysis on individual key regulators revealed that higher expression of IRS1 and DLL1 and lower expression of HMGA2, ACTN1 and SKI were associated with better survival probabilities. Conclusions: It is evident from the results that our hierarchical systems-level multidimensional analysis approach has been successful in isolating the converging regulatory modules and associated key regulatory molecules that are potential biomarkers for pancreatic cancer progression.

References Powered by Scopus

Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles

36149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2014

11530Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2009

10128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Oncogenic KRAS-driven metabolic reprogramming in pancreatic cancer cells utilizes cytokines from the tumor microenvironment

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analytic support vector machine for integrating multiple omics data

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dying tumor cell-derived exosomal miR-194-5p potentiates survival and repopulation of tumor repopulating cells upon radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rajamani, D., & Bhasin, M. K. (2016). Identification of key regulators of pancreatic cancer progression through multidimensional systems-level analysis. Genome Medicine, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0282-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

59%

Researcher 18

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 18

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 16

31%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

25%

Computer Science 5

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free