Improved global modelling of HOx recycling in isoprene oxidation: Evaluation against the GABRIEL and INTEX-A aircraft campaign measurements

77Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stimulated by recent important developments regarding the oxidation chemistry of isoprene, this study evaluates and quantifies the impacts of different mechanism updates on the boundary layer concentrations of OH and HO2 radicals using the IMAGESv2 global chemistry transport model. The model results for HOx, isoprene, NO, and ozone are evaluated against air-based observations from the GABRIEL campaign, conducted over the Guyanas in October 2005, and from the INTEX-A campaign over the Eastern US in summer 2004. The version 2 of the Mainz Isoprene Mechanism (MIM2, Taraborrelli et al., 2009) used as reference mechanism in our simulations, has been modified to test (i) the artificial OH recycling proposed by Lelieveld et al. (2008), (ii) the epoxide formation mechanism proposed by Paulot et al. (2009b), and finally (iii) the HOx regeneration of the Leuven Isoprene Mechanism (LIM0) proposed by Peeters and Müller (2010). The simulations show that the LIM0 scheme holds by far the largest potential impact on HOx concentrations over densely vegetated areas in the Tropics as well as at mid-latitudes. Strong increases, by up to a factor of 4 in the modelled OH concentrations, and by a factor of 2.5-3 in the HO2 abundances are estimated through the LIM0 mechanism compared to the traditional isoprene degradation schemes. Comparatively much smaller OH increases (<25%) are associated with the implementation of the mechanism of Paulot et al. (2009b); moreover, the global production of epoxides is strongly suppressed (by a factor of 4) when the LIM0 scheme is combined with this mechanism. Hydroperoxy- aldehydes (HPALDs) are found to be major first-generation products in the oxidation of isoprene by OH, with a combined globally averaged yield of 50-60%. The use of the LIM0 chemistry in the global model allows for reconciling the model with the observed concentrations at a satisfactory level, compared to the other tested mechanisms, as the observed averaged mixing ratios of both OH and HO2 in the boundary layer can be reproduced to within 30%. In spite of the remaining uncertainties in the theoretically-predicted rates of critical radical reactions leading to the formation of HPALDs, and even more in the subsequent degradation of these new compounds, the current findings make a strong case for the newly proposed chemical scheme. Experimental confirmation and quantification is urgently needed for the formation of HPALDs and for their fast OH-generating photolysis. © 2010 Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models

1873Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004

1315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II - Gas phase reactions of organic species

1301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing

634Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tropospheric OH and HO<inf>2</inf> radicals: Field measurements and model comparisons

400Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene

384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stavrakou, T., Peeters, J., & Müller, J. F. (2010). Improved global modelling of HOx recycling in isoprene oxidation: Evaluation against the GABRIEL and INTEX-A aircraft campaign measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(20), 9863–9878. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9863-2010

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

51%

Researcher 16

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 15

33%

Environmental Science 15

33%

Chemistry 12

26%

Engineering 4

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free