Interactions between leaf nitrogen status and longevity in relation to N cycling in three contrasting European forest canopies

21Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Seasonal and spatial variations in foliar nitrogen (N) parameters were investigated in three European forests with different tree species, viz. beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growing in Denmark, the Netherlands and Finland, respectively. The objectives were to investigate the distribution of N pools within the canopies of the different forests and to relate this distribution to factors and plant strategies controlling leaf development throughout the seasonal course of a vegetation period. Leaf N pools generally showed much higher seasonal and vertical variability in beech than in the coniferous canopies. However, also the two coniferous tree species behaved very differently with respect to peak summer canopy N content and N re-translocation efficiency, showing that generalisations on tree internal vs. ecosystem internal N cycling cannot be made on the basis of the leaf duration alone. During phases of intensive N turnover in spring and autumn, the NH4+ concentration in beech leaves rose considerably, while fully developed green beech leaves had relatively low tissue NH4+, similar to the steadily low levels in Douglas fir and, particularly, in Scots pine. The ratio between bulk foliar concentrations of NH4+ and H+, which is an indicator of the NH3 emission potential, reflected differences in foliage N concentration, with beech having the highest values followed by Douglas fir and Scots pine. Irrespectively of the leaf habit, i.e. deciduous versus evergreen, the majority of the canopy foliage N was retained within the trees. This was accomplished through an effective N re-translocation (beech), higher foliage longevity (fir) or both (boreal pine forest). In combination with data from a literature review, a general relationship of decreasing N re-translocation efficiency with the time needed for canopy renewal was deduced, showing that leaves which live longer re-translocate relatively less N during senescence. The Douglas fir stand, exposed to relatively high atmospheric N deposition, had by far the largest peak summer canopy N content and also returned the largest amount of N in foliage litter, suggesting that higher N fertility leads to increased turnover in the ecosystem N cycle with higher risks of losses such as leaching and gas emissions. © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

References Powered by Scopus

Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur?

2906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NH<inf>4</inf><sup>+</sup> toxicity in higher plants: A critical review

1497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: Are there general patterns?

1088Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On the tracks of Nitrogen deposition effects on temperate forests at their southern European range - an observational study from Italy

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecological consequences of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) cultivation in Europe

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Age-Related Modulation of the Nitrogen Resorption Efficiency Response to Growth Requirements and Soil Nitrogen Availability in a Temperate Pine Plantation

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L., Ibrom, A., Korhonen, J. F. J., Arnoud Frumau, K. F., Wu, J., Pihlatie, M., & Schjoerring, J. K. (2013). Interactions between leaf nitrogen status and longevity in relation to N cycling in three contrasting European forest canopies. Biogeosciences, 10(2), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-999-2013

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

43%

Researcher 16

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15

35%

Environmental Science 15

35%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 11

26%

Social Sciences 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0