Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance

440Citations
Citations of this article
427Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The growth in international research on public service motivation (PSM) raises a number of important questions about the degree to which the theory and research developed in one country can contribute to our understanding of PSM in other counties. To help address this issue, this study revisits the conceptual and operational definitions of PSM to address weaknesses previously noted in the literature. Although some important steps have been taken to both improve and internationalize the PSM scale, this work has been done incrementally. In contrast, this study takes a more systematic and comprehensive approach by combining the efforts of international PSM scholars to develop and then test a revised measurement instrument for PSM in 12 countries. Although the resulting four dimensional 16-item measure of PSM reported here provides a better theoretical and empirical foundation for the measurement of PSM, our results suggest that the exact meaning and scaling of PSM dimensions are likely to differ across cultures and languages. These results raise serious concerns regarding the ability to develop a single universal scale of PSM, or making direct comparisons of PSM across countries. © 2012 The Author.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., … De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. In Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (Vol. 23, pp. 79–102). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus027

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 208

73%

Researcher 29

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 26

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 21

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 136

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 93

34%

Psychology 22

8%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free