An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most of what we know about parafoveal preprocessing during reading is based on the boundary paradigm in combination with parafoveal masks as a presumably neutral baseline condition. Recent evidence questions the neutrality of the baseline condition by showing that parafoveal masks inflict preview costs. Using a novel, incremental boundary paradigm we studied the effect of parafoveal masks. Manipulating the salience of parafoveal previews, we found that increasing salience of the masks resulted in increasingly longer fixation times on target words, but also on pretarget words-suggesting preview costs. We conclude that the hidden preview costs of parafoveal masks in the classical boundary paradigm inflate the processing times for the baseline condition and hence lead to an overestimation of the preview benefit. Thus, the present study questions the validity of some of the conclusions drawn on the basis of the classical boundary paradigm.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutzler, F., Schuster, S., Marx, C., & Hawelka, S. (2019). An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm. PLoS ONE, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203013

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Researcher 5

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

50%

Neuroscience 3

25%

Linguistics 2

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free