A large-scale simulation model to assess karstic groundwater recharge over Europe and the Mediterranean

97Citations
Citations of this article
162Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Karst develops through the dissolution of carbonate rock and is a major source of groundwater contributing up to half of the total drinking water supply in some European countries. Previous approaches to model future water availability in Europe are either too-small scale or do not incorporate karst processes, i.e. preferential flow paths. This study presents the first simulations of groundwater recharge in all karst regions in Europe with a parsimonious karst hydrology model. A novel parameter confinement strategy combines a priori information with recharge-related observations (actual evapotranspiration and soil moisture) at locations across Europe while explicitly identifying uncertainty in the model parameters. Europe's karst regions are divided into four typical karst landscapes (humid, mountain, Mediterranean and desert) by cluster analysis and recharge is simulated from 2002 to 2012 for each karst landscape. Mean annual recharge ranges from negligible in deserts to > 1 m a-1 in humid regions. The majority of recharge rates range from 20 to 50% of precipitation and are sensitive to subannual climate variability. Simulation results are consistent with independent observations of mean annual recharge and significantly better than other global hydrology models that do not consider karst processes (PCR-GLOBWB, WaterGAP). Global hydrology models systematically under-estimate karst recharge implying that they over-estimate actual evapotranspiration and surface runoff. Karst water budgets and thus information to support management decisions regarding drinking water supply and flood risk are significantly improved by our model.

Figures

  • Figure 1. (a) Schematic description of the model for one grid cell including the soil (yellow) and epikarst storages (grey) and the simulated fluxes, (b) its gridded discretization over karst regions and (c) the subsurface heterogeneity that its structure represents for each grid cell.
  • Table 1. Data availability, data properties and sources.
  • Table 2. Parameter description and initial ranges for Monte Carlo sampling based on previous field studies and large-scale model applications.
  • Figure 2. Carbonate rock areas over Europe and the Mediterranean, and location of the selected FLUXNET and ISMN stations.
  • Table 3. Independent observations of mean annual recharge from field and modelling studies over Europe and the Mediterranean.
  • Figure 3. Schematic elaboration of the regional sensitivity analysis procedure.
  • Table 4. Cluster means of the four identified karst landscapes (AI: aridity index, DS: mean annual number of days with snow cover, RA: range of altitudes).
  • Figure 4. Map with clusters and typical karst landscapes that were attributed to them.

References Powered by Scopus

World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated

9022Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer

5621Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Global Land Data Assimilation System

4311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater depletion: A review

365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling

319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The International Soil Moisture Network: Serving Earth system science for over a decade

215Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartmann, A., Gleeson, T., Rosolem, R., Pianosi, F., Wada, Y., & Wagener, T. (2015). A large-scale simulation model to assess karstic groundwater recharge over Europe and the Mediterranean. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(6), 1729–1746. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1729-2015

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

62%

Researcher 24

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 39

43%

Engineering 24

26%

Environmental Science 24

26%

Social Sciences 4

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0