N of 1 randomised controlled trials of oral ketamine in patients with chronic pain

89Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Anecdotal reports suggest that the general anaesthetic drug ketamine, taken orally in low doses, can give rise to some extra analgesia in patients with refractory neuropathic pain. This study was designed to determine the proportion of patients with chronic neuropathic pain responding to oral ketamine, and then to separate the true treatment effect from non-specific effects by means of an n of 1 randomised controlled trial. Twenty-one patients gave informed consent and completed daily pain diaries and continued on their usual treatments (drug and non-drug) for the duration of the study. After a 'baseline' week, oral ketamine was taken once a day for 1 week. The dose of 20 mg was increased each day until an analgesic effect was noticed or adverse effects occurred, or until a maximum of 100 mg was reached. Those patients responding to oral ketamine were then entered into the n of 1 randomised trial which consisted of three treatment/placebo week pairs. Twelve patients did not progress to the n of 1 trial because of no benefit and/or intolerable adverse effects (dizziness, drowsiness etc.). Nine patients completed the n of 1 trial; there was no difference between the ketamine and placebo weeks in six patients; one patient demonstrated effective analgesia with ketamine, but it was of short duration and marred by unpleasant adverse effects; two patients showed some evidence of a beneficial response to ketamine, and continued with the oral ketamine after the trial. We conclude that oral ketamine only gave rise to an extra analgesic response in three out of 21 patients with chronic neuropathic pain (14%). Adverse effects limited the use of the drug in almost half of the patients. The n of 1 trial was useful in demonstrating no true therapeutic effect for the ketamine in two thirds of the patients progressing to that part of the trial. Copyright (C) 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

References Powered by Scopus

Relief of post-herpetic neuralgia with the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor antagonist ketamine: A double-blind, cross-over comparison with morphine and placebo

437Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of I.M. and oral ketamine

292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Response of chronic neuropathic pain syndromes to ketamine: a preliminary study

289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The n-of-1 clinical trial: The ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine?

526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ketamine in Chronic Pain Management: An Evidence-Based Review

312Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists

237Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haines, D. R., & Gaines, S. P. (1999). N of 1 randomised controlled trials of oral ketamine in patients with chronic pain. Pain, 83(2), 283–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00117-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

61%

Researcher 8

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

64%

Psychology 8

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free