Nanomechanical assessment of human and murine collagen fibrils via atomic force microscopy cantilever-based nanoindentation

67Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The nanomechanical assessment of collagen fibrils via atomic force microscopy (AFM) is of increasing interest within the biomedical research community. In contrast to conventional nanoindentation there exists no common standard for conducting experiments and analysis of data. Currently used analysis approaches vary between studies and validation of quantitative results is usually not performed, which makes comparison of data from different studies difficult. Also there are no recommendations with regards to the maximum indentation depth that should not be exceeded to avoid substrate effects. Here we present a methodology and analysis approach for AFM cantilever-based nanoindentation experiments that allows efficient use of captured data and relying on a reference sample for determination of tip shape. Further we show experimental evidence that maximum indentation depth on collagen fibrils should be lower than 10-15% of the height of the fibril to avoid substrate effects and we show comparisons between our and other approaches used in previous works. While our analysis approach yields similar values for indentation modulus compared to the Oliver-Pharr method we found that Hertzian analysis yielded significantly lower values. Applying our approach we successfully and efficiently indented collagen fibrils from human bronchi, which were about 30. nm in size, considerably smaller compared to collagen fibrils obtained from murine tail-tendon. In addition, derived mechanical parameters of collagen fibrils are in agreement with data previously published. To establish a quantitative validation we compared indentation results from conventional and AFM cantilever-based nanoindentation on polymeric samples with known mechanical properties. Importantly we can show that our approach yields similar results when compared to conventional nanoindentation on polymer samples. Introducing an approach that is reliable, efficient and taking into account the AFM tip shape, we anticipate that the present work may act as a guideline for conducting AFM cantilever-based nanoindentation of collagen fibrils. This may aid understanding of collagen-related diseases such as asthma, lung fibrosis or bone disease with potential alterations of collagen fibril mechanics. © 2014.

References Powered by Scopus

Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology

6982Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The material bone: Structure-mechanical function relations

2457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nature's hierarchical materials

2374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Correlating confocal microscopy and atomic force indentation reveals metastatic cancer cells stiffen during invasion into collagen i matrices

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Techniques to assess bone ultrastructure organization: Orientation and arrangement of mineralized collagen fibrils

121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nanoscale dysregulation of collagen structure-function disrupts mechano-homeostasis and mediates pulmonary fibrosis

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andriotis, O. G., Manuyakorn, W., Zekonyte, J., Katsamenis, O. L., Fabri, S., Howarth, P. H., … Thurner, P. J. (2014). Nanomechanical assessment of human and murine collagen fibrils via atomic force microscopy cantilever-based nanoindentation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 39, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.015

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

75%

Researcher 10

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 27

48%

Materials Science 14

25%

Physics and Astronomy 8

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free