Optimal adjustment of the atmospheric forcing parameters of ocean models using sea surface temperature data assimilation

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In ocean general circulation models, near-surface atmospheric variables used to specify the atmospheric boundary condition remain one of the main sources of error. The objective of this research is to constrain the surface forcing function of an ocean model by sea surface temperature (SST) data assimilation. For that purpose, a set of corrections for ERAinterim (hereafter ERAi) reanalysis data is estimated for the period of 1989-2007, using a sequential assimilation method, with ensemble experiments to evaluate the impact of uncertain atmospheric forcing on the ocean state. The control vector of the assimilation method is extended to atmospheric variables to obtain monthly mean parameter corrections by assimilating monthly SST and sea surface salinity (SSS) climatological data in a low resolution global configuration of the NEMO model. In this context, the careful determination of the prior probability distribution of the parameters is an important matter. This paper demonstrates the importance of isolating the impact of forcing errors in the model to perform relevant ensemble experiments. The results obtained for every month of the period between 1989 and 2007 show that the estimated parameters produce the same kind of impact on the SST as the analysis itself. The objective is then to evaluate the long-term time series of the forcing parameters focusing on trends and mean error corrections of air-sea fluxes. Our corrections tend to equilibrate the net heat-flux balance at the global scale (highly positive in ERAi database), and to remove the potentially unrealistic negative trend (leading to ocean cooling) in the ERAi net heat flux over the whole time period. More specifically in the intertropical band, we reduce the warm bias of ERAi data by mostly modifying the latent heat flux by wind speed intensification. Consistently, when used to force the model, the corrected parameters lead to a better agreement between the mean SST produced by the model and mean SST observations over the period of 1989-2007 in the intertropical band. © 2013 Author(s).

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Top: Mean difference between turbulent heat flux (Qturb =Qlat +Qsens, in W m−2) climatologies (1984–2000) estimated from different bulk algorithms (different transfer coefficients parametrizations): COA3 described by Fairall et al. (2003) and LY04. These climatologies are computed with the same atmospheric forcing field and the same prescribed SST (from Brodeau (2007)). Bottom: Mean difference between net heat-flux (in W m−2) climatologies (1989–2007) estimated with air temperature, air humidity and wind speed from different data sets (ERAinterim and DFS4.3 as described in Brodeau et al., 2010). These climatologies only differ by the atmospheric parameters used and are computed with the LY04 bulk algorithm.
  • Fig. 2. January ensemble standard deviation in terms of air temperature (top left), shortwave radiation (top right), zonal wind speed (bottom left), and meridional wind speed (bottom right).
  • Fig. 3. SST differences between the free model run forced by ERAi and the result of the analysis step (top), and between the free model run forced by ERAi and the free model run forced by ERAcor (bottom) for January 2004.
  • Fig. 4. 1989–2007 mean computed corrections of temperature (t2), humidity (q2), zonal wind speed (u10), meridional wind speed (v10), downward shortwave radiation (radsw), and downward long-wave radiation (radlw).
  • Fig. 5. 1989–2007 zonal mean computed corrections of temperature (t2), humidity (q2), zonal wind speed (u10), meridional wind speed (v10), downward shortwave radiation (radsw), and downward long-wave radiation (radlw).
  • Fig. 6. 1989–2007 time series of global net heat fluxes monthly means (in red) computed with ERAi variables (left) and ERAcor variables (right). The black lines represent the global mean of the net heat flux over the whole 1989–2007 period.
  • Fig. 7. 1989–2007 means of net heat-flux correction, radiative heatflux corrections and turbulent heat-flux corrections in the 20◦ N– 20◦ S latitude band.
  • Fig. 8. 1989–2007 mean wind speed correction in the 20◦ N–20◦ S latitude band. Isocontours from −2 to 2 m s−1 by 1.

References Powered by Scopus

A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems

23246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system

20627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes: Updates and verification for the COARE algorithm

2151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A generic approach to explicit simulation of uncertainty in the NEMO ocean model

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coupled atmosphere–ocean data assimilation experiments with a low-order model and CMIP5 model data

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drivers of the autumn phytoplankton development in the open Black Sea

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meinvielle, M., Brankart, J. M., Brasseur, P., Barnier, B., Dussin, R., & Verron, J. (2013). Optimal adjustment of the atmospheric forcing parameters of ocean models using sea surface temperature data assimilation. Ocean Science, 9(5), 867–883. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-867-2013

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Researcher 4

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 9

75%

Physics and Astronomy 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Environmental Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0