Probabilistic approach to cloud and snow detection on Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) imagery

28Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Derivation of probability estimates complementary to geophysical data sets has gained special attention over the last years. Information about a confidence level of provided physical quantities is required to construct an error budget of higher-level products and to correctly interpret final results of a particular analysis. Regarding the generation of products based on satellite data a common input consists of a cloud mask which allows discrimination between surface and cloud signals. Further the surface information is divided between snow and snow-free components. At any step of this discrimination process a misclassification in a cloud/snow mask propagates to higher-level products and may alter their usability.Within this scope a novel probabilistic cloud mask (PCM) algorithm suited for the 1 km1 km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data is proposed which provides three types of probability estimates between: cloudy/clear-sky, cloudy/snow and clearsky/ snow conditions. As opposed to th majority of available techniques which are usually based on the decision-tree approach in the PCM algorithm all spectral, angular and ancillary information is used in a single step to retrieve probability estimates from the precomputed look-up tables (LUTs). Moreover, the issue of derivation of a single threshold value for a spectral test was overcome by the concept of multidimensional information space which is divided into small bins by an extensive set of intervals. The discrimination between snow and ice clouds and detection of broken, thin clouds was enhanced by means of the invariant coordinate system (ICS) transformation. The study area covers a wide range of environmental conditions spanning from Iceland through central Europe to northern parts of Africa which exhibit diverse difficulties for cloud/snow masking algorithms. The retrieved PCM cloud classification was compared to the Polar Platform System (PPS) version 2012 and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) collection 6 cloud masks, SYNOP (surface synoptic observations) weather reports, Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) vertical feature mask version 3 and to MODIS collection 5 snow mask. The outcomes of conducted analyses proved fine detection skills of the PCM method with results comparable to or better than the reference PPS algorithm.

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Differences between enhanced spectral features (ESFs) generated by the invariant coordinate system (ICS) transformation and the AVHRR channel 1 (0.6 µm) and channel 3b (3.7 µm). Bottom panels depict the differences between the ESFs and the AVHRR reflectances retrieved from the spectral profiles marked as the red lines. For details see Sects. 3.2.2 and 3.2.1.
  • Fig. 2. Schematic graph presenting the concept of probability derivation in the PCM algorithm based on the two-dimensional spectral space composed of the reflectances at 0.6 and 1.6 µm. In the equation P denotes probability and numbers denote the counts of cloudy, clear and snow pixels within a bin. The samples were derived from the PPS and MOD10A1 classifications of the NOAA17 satellite scene acquired over the Alps on 1 January 2008.
  • Fig. 4. Derivation of cloud shadow. For details see Sect. 3.6.
  • Fig. 3. Flow chart of the PCM algorithm. For details see Sect. 3.5.
  • Fig. 5. PCM classification example of the NOAA17 scene acquired over the Alps on 1 January 2008 at 10:00 UTC. (a) False-colour composite (R = 1.6 µm, G = 0.8 µm, B = 0.6 µm), (b) probabilistic cloud and snow mask, (c) binary cloud/cloud shadow/snow/land-water mask with classes described in Sect. 3.6. In (b) and (c) grey colour depicts clouds, green depicts snow-free areas, blue depicts water and light blue depicts snow.
  • Fig. 6. Scatter plots of the total cloud cover estimates computed over each of the NOAA16, 17 and 18 satellites scenes separately for the PCM and PPS algorithms. Red line denotes linear trend between these two data sets. Some statistics of the PCM–PPS total cloud cover differences distribution are reported. For details see Sect. 4.1.
  • Fig. 7. Total cloud cover differences PCM–PPS as a function of selected variables derived from the annual pixel counts for the years 2011 (NOAA16) and 2008 (NOAA17 and 18). Data frequency is presented as grey-shaded histograms. Red lines denote trends computed by the smoothing spline method. For details see Sect. 4.1.
  • Fig. 8. Total cloud cover differences PCM–PPS as a function of land cover derived from the annual pixel counts for the years 2011 (NOAA16) and 2008 (NOAA17 and 18). For details see Sect. 4.1.

References Powered by Scopus

Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6s: an overview

2648Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS

2102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching in fixed dimensions

1843Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A geographic information-driven method and a new large scale dataset for remote sensing cloud/snow detection

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lake surface water temperature derived from 35 years of AVHRR sensor data for European lakes

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lake ice phenology from AVHRR data for European lakes: An automated two-step extraction method

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Musial, J. P., Hüsler, F., Sütterlin, M., Neuhaus, C., & Wunderle, S. (2014). Probabilistic approach to cloud and snow detection on Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) imagery. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7(3), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-799-2014

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

52%

Researcher 8

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 8

42%

Environmental Science 7

37%

Engineering 3

16%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0