Reliability of the Q Force; a mobile instrument for measuring isometric quadriceps muscle strength

4Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The ability to generate muscle strength is a pre-requisite for all human movement. Decreased quadriceps muscle strength is frequently observed in older adults and is associated with a decreased performance and activity limitations. To quantify the quadriceps muscle strength and to monitor changes over time, instruments and procedures with a sufficient reliability are needed. The Q Force is an innovative mobile muscle strength measurement instrument suitable to measure in various degrees of extension. Measurements between 110 and 130° extension present the highest values and the most significant increase after training. The objective of this study is to determine the test-retest reliability of muscle strength measurements by the Q Force in older adults in 110° extension. Methods: Forty-one healthy older adults, 13 males and 28 females were included in the study. Mean (SD) age was 81.9 (4.89) years. Isometric muscle strength of the Quadriceps muscle was assessed with the Q Force at 110° of knee extension. Participants were measured at two sessions with a three to eight day interval between sessions. To determine relative reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. To determine absolute reliability, Bland and Altman Limits of Agreement (LOA) were calculated and t-tests were performed. Results: Relative reliability of the Q Force is good to excellent as all ICC coefficients are higher than 0.75. Generally a large 95 % LOA, reflecting only moderate absolute reliability, is found as exemplified for the peak torque left leg of −18.6 N to 33.8 N and the right leg of −9.2 N to 26.4 N was between 15.7 and 23.6 Newton representing 25.2 % to 39.9 % of the size of the mean. Small systematic differences in mean were found between measurement session 1 and 2. Conclusion: The present study shows that the Q Force has excellent relative test-retest reliability, but limited absolute test-retest reliability. Since the Q Force is relatively cheap and mobile it is suitable for application in various clinical settings, however, its capability to detect changes in muscle force over time is limited but comparable to existing instruments.

References Powered by Scopus

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

42275Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability

19153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission

7405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Heart Rehabilitation in patients awaiting Open heart surgery targeting to prevent Complications and to improve Quality of life (Heart-ROCQ): Study protocol for a prospective, randomised, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measures of attributes of locomotor capacity in older people: a systematic literature review following the COSMIN methodology

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A portable isometric knee extensor strength testing device: test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores of the Q-Force ӀӀ in healthy adults

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Douma, K. W., Regterschot, G. R. H., Krijnen, W. P., Slager, G. E. C., Van Der Schans, C. P., & Zijlstra, W. (2016). Reliability of the Q Force; a mobile instrument for measuring isometric quadriceps muscle strength. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0029-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

71%

Researcher 4

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

29%

Sports and Recreations 4

24%

Engineering 3

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 318

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free