Review and parameterisation of bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere

176Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Current deposition schemes used in atmospheric chemical transport models do not generally account for bi-directional exchange of ammonia (NH3). Bi-directional exchange schemes, which have so far been applied at the plot scale, can be included in transport models, but need to be parameterised with appropriate values of the ground layer compensation point (χg), stomatal compensation point (χs) and cuticular resistance (R w). We review existing measurements of χg, χs as well as Rw and compile a comprehensive dataset from which we then propose generalised parameterisations. χs is related to Γs, the non-dimensional ratio of [NH4+]apo and [H+]apo in the apoplast, through the temperature dependence of the combined Henry and dissociation equilibrium. The meta-analysis suggests that the nitrogen (N) input is the main driver of the apoplastic and bulk leaf concentrations of ammonium (NH4apo, NH4bulk). For managed ecosystems, the main source of N is fertilisation which is reflected in a peak value of χs a few days following application, but also alters seasonal values of NH4apo and NH4bulk. We propose a parameterisation for χs which includes peak values as a function of amount and type of fertiliser application which gradually decreases to a background value. The background χs is based on total N input to the ecosystem as a yearly fertiliser application and N deposition (Ni). For non-managed ecosystems, χs is parameterised based solely on the link with Nidep. For Riw we propose a general parameterisation as a function of atmospheric relative humidity (RH), incorporating a minimum value (Riw(min)), which depends on the ratio of atmospheric acid concentrations (SO2, HNO3 and HCl) to NH3 concentrations. The parameterisations are based mainly on datasets from temperate locations in northern Europe making them most suitable for up-scaling in these regions (EMEP model for example). In principle, the parameterisations should be applicable to other climates, though there is a need for more underpinning data, with the uncertainties being especially large for tropical and subtropical conditions. © 2010 Author(s).

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Big leaf (a) and two layer (b) resistance scheme for bidirectional NH3 exchange between the vegetation and the atmosphere from Sutton et al. (1995b). Ft, Fs, Fw and Fg are the total, stomatal, cuticular and ground layer fluxes of NH3 respectively; Ra, Rb, Rw, Rs, Rac and Rbg are the aerodynamic, leaf boundary layer, cuticular, stomatal, in canopy aerodynamic and ground boundary layer resistances to exchange; χa is the atmospheric NH3 concentration; χc, χs and χg are the canopy, stomatal and ground layer NH3 compensation points respectively.
  • Table 1. Compiled data of Rw as a function of RH1.
  • Fig. 2. Compilation of cuticular resistance (Rw(corr)) as a function of relative humidity (RH) at height z0 separated according to ecosystem type. Dotted lines represent forest ecosystems, short dashed lines represent short semi-natural ecosystems, solid lines represent grasslands and star marked lines represent arable crops. The top x-axis represents the corresponding vapour pressure deficit (VPD) for the primary x-axis at a temperature of 10 ◦C. Different colours represent the corresponding molar ratio of total acid/NH3 (AR). Numbers correspond to Table 1.
  • Fig. 3. Summary of stomatal ammonia emission potential (0s) from different studies (see Tables 2 and 3) as reported in the literature (means or single measurements) separated according to ecosystem type. Round symbols represent values derived from modelling, triangles represent values measured by the apoplast extraction technique and squares represent values measured by the gas exchange method. Full lines represent the mean and dashed lines the standard deviation around the mean per ecosystem type.
  • Fig. 4. (a) Compiled stomatal ammonia emission potential (0s) for managed ecosystem types as a function of measured bulk tissue [NH+4 ]bulk concentrations. Round symbols represent arable crops and triangle symbols represent grasslands. The black line is the best fit exponential curve derived by minimisation of the least square method and the dashed line is the 95% confidence band. The green line is the linear function previously derived by Mattsson et al. (2009b) between 0s and [NH + 4 ]bulk for different grass species. (b) Compiled stomatal ammonia emission potential (0s) for un-managed ecosystem types as a function of bulk tissue [NH + 4 ]bulk concentrations. Red symbols represent [NH+4 ]bulk derived from N deposition values according to Eq. (7) while blue symbols represent measured concentrations. Asterisks represent forests and diamonds represent short semi-natural ecosystem types. The full, dashed and green lines are similar to (a).
  • Fig. 5. (a) and (c) Compiled stomatal ammonia emission potential (0s) for non-managed ecosystem types as a function of total N input to the ecosystem on a linear and logarithmic scale respectively. Data are separated according to the data source of the Nin value (EMEP model estimated, site-based measurements and bulk tissue derived values according to Eq. 7). Red and blue symbols have only atmospheric deposition as an N source and green symbols have atmospheric deposition as well as fertiliser as N source. The line is the best fit power function derived by minimisation of the least square method excluding data for laboratory based experiments (green symbols) (refer to text). (b) and (d) Compiled stomatal ammonia emission potential (0s) for managed ecosystem types as a function of total N input on a linear and logarithmic scale respectively. The black line is the best fit equation to the data points. Red triangles represent field grassland measurements, green and red circles represent field based and laboratory based measurements on arable crops respectively. Approximated fertiliser N input values for laboratory based experiments are given in Table 3.
  • Table 4. Compiled data of 0g values.
  • Fig. 6. (a) Compiled maximal stomatal ammonia emission potential (0s(max)) for managed ecosystem types (i) the first day after fertilisation (red diamonds) as a function of applied fertilisation rate (primary x-axis) or (ii) grown in hydroponics (blue circles) as a function of [NH+4 ] concentration in the nutritive solution (secondary x axis). The line is the best fit linear function derived by minimisation of the least square method for the two series (hydroponics and soil). One mM of NH+4 in the nutritive solution was approximated to be equal to 22 kg N ha −1. (b) Dynamics of 0s in the days following N fertiliser application (symbols) and adjusted functions (curved lines) according to Eq. (20).

References Powered by Scopus

How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world

3343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The nitrogen cascade

2469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system

1940Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model – Technical description

578Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ammonia emissions in the United States, european union, and China derived by high-resolution inversion of ammonium wet deposition data: Interpretation with a new agricultural emissions inventory (MASAGE_NH3)

356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Massad, R. S., Nemitz, E., & Sutton, M. A. (2010). Review and parameterisation of bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10359-2010

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 40

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 40

47%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 22

26%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15

18%

Chemistry 8

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0