Seismic imaging of sandbox experiments-laboratory hardware setup and first reflection seismic sections

14Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the study and technical development introduced here, we combine analogue sandbox simulation techniques with seismic physical modelling of sandbox models. For that purpose, we designed and developed a new mini-seismic facility for laboratory use, comprising a seismic tank, a PC-driven control unit, a positioning system, and piezoelectric transducers used here for the first time in an array mode. To assess the possibilities and limits of seismic imaging of small-scale structures in sandbox models, different geometry setups were tested in the first 2-D experiments that also tested the proper functioning of the device and studied the seismo-elastic properties of the granular media used. Simple two-layer models of different materials and layer thicknesses as well as a more complex model comprising channels and shear zones were tested using different acquisition geometries and signal properties. We suggest using well sorted and well rounded grains with little surface roughness (glass beads). Source receiver-offsets less than 14 cm for imaging structures as small as 2.0-1.5 mm size have proven feasible. This is the best compromise between wide beam and high energy output, and is applicable with a consistent waveform. Resolution of the interfaces of layers of granular materials depends on the interface preparation rather than on the material itself. Flat grading of interfaces and powder coverage yields the clearest interface reflections. Finally, sandbox seismic sections provide images of high quality showing constant thickness layers as well as predefined channel structures and indications of the fault traces from shear zones. Since these were artificially introduced in our test models, they can be regarded as zones of disturbance rather than tectonic shear zones characterized by decompaction. The multiple-offset surveying introduced here, improves the quality with respect to S/N ratio and source signature even more; the maximum depth penetration in glass-bead layers thereby amounts to 5 cm. Thus, the presented mini-seismic device is already able to resolve structures within simple models of saturated porous media, so that multiple-offset seismic imaging of shallow sandbox models, that are structurally evolving, is generally feasible. © 2013 Author(s).

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Experimental device and setup of the mini-seismic system in the laboratory. The system consists of a seismic tank, a PC-driven control unit, a positioning system, and piezoelectric transducers (for technical details see also Table 1 and Figs. 2 and 3).
  • Table 1. Components and technical specifications of the laboratory seismic device.
  • Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of the functions performed by the PC control unit for communication with the positioning system and the transducers.
  • Fig. 3. Transducer array (top) and technical characteristics of the piezoelectric elements used (bottom).
  • Fig. 4. Principle experiment geometries and resulting common-offset gathers from different test series acquired with the laboratory seismic system. (A, B) Flat reflector experiments testing different source frequencies; (C, D) wedge experiments with different layer materials for attenuation and scattering analyses (note the larger vertical scale in (D)).
  • Fig. 5. Setup of the interface model to test seismic imaging properties of selected granular materials and of differently prepared interfaces. The lines labelled P1–P4 mark the locations of the seismic sections shown in Fig. 6.
  • Fig. 6. Reflection seismic sections across the interface model located at lines P1–P4 given in Fig. 5. The interface is best imaged when it is prepared by grading and powder as well as between wellrounded and well-sorted glass beads (P1, P2).
  • Fig. 7. Setup of the channel model consisting of two glass-bead layers. While a shear zone of 30◦ dip angle is prepared close to the left side of the analogue model, a channel structure is distributed over three positions in the model. Lines a–c mark locations of the seismic sections shown in Fig. 9.

References Powered by Scopus

Mechanics of fold-and- thrust belts and accretionary wedges.

2187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theory of scale models as applied to the study of geologic structures

796Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurements of friction coefficients and cohesion for faulting and fault reactivation in laboratory models using sand and sand mixtures

322Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A review of analogue modelling of geodynamic processes: Approaches, scaling, materials and quantification, with an application to subduction experiments

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Arcuate stress state in accretionary prisms from real-scale numerical sandbox experiments

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Small-scale physical modeling of seismic-wave propagation using unconsolidated granular media

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krawczyk, C. M., Buddensiek, M. L., Oncken, O., & Kukowski, N. (2013). Seismic imaging of sandbox experiments-laboratory hardware setup and first reflection seismic sections. Solid Earth, 4(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-4-93-2013

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 22

49%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 43

90%

Engineering 4

8%

Physics and Astronomy 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0