Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation

47Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We use global models to explore the microphysical effects of carbonaceous aerosols on liquid clouds. Although absorption of solar radiation by soot warms the atmosphere, soot may cause climate cooling due to its contribution to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and therefore cloud brightness. Six global models conducted three soot experiments; four of the models had detailed aerosol microphysical schemes. The average cloud radiative response to biofuel soot (black and organic carbon), including both indirect and semi-direct effects, is -0.11 Wm-2, comparable in size but opposite in sign to the respective direct effect. In a more idealized fossil fuel black carbon experiment, some models calculated a positive cloud response because soot provides a deposition sink for sulfuric and nitric acids and secondary organics, decreasing nucleation and evolution of viable CCN. Biofuel soot particles were also typically assumed to be larger and more hygroscopic than for fossil fuel soot and therefore caused more negative forcing, as also found in previous studies. Diesel soot (black and organic carbon) experiments had relatively smaller cloud impacts with five of the models

References Powered by Scopus

2550Citations
1447Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

1960Citations
1193Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

4713Citations
3361Readers

This article is free to access.

Global air quality and climate

379Citations
414Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koch, D., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Easter, R. C., Ferrachat, S., Ghan, S. J., … Yan, N. (2011). Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(3), 1051–1064. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1051-2011

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

53%

Researcher 20

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 22

37%

Environmental Science 22

37%

Chemistry 9

15%

Engineering 6

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0