Stability and forcing of the Iceland-Faroe inflow of water, heat, and salt to the Arctic

44Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The flow of Atlantic water across the Greenland-Scotland Ridge (Atlantic inflow) is critical for conditions in the Nordic Seas and Arctic Ocean by importing heat and salt. Here, we present a decade-long series of measurements from the Iceland-Faroe inflow branch (IF-inflow), which carries almost half the total Atlantic inflow. The observations show no significant trend in volume transport of Atlantic water, but temperature and salinity increased during the observational period. On shorter time scales, the observations show considerable variations but no statistically significant seasonal variation is observed and even weekly averaged transport values were consistently uni-directional from the Atlantic into the Nordic Seas. Combining transport time-series with sea level height from satellite altimetry and wind stress reveals that the force driving the IF-inflow across the topographic barrier of the Ridge is mainly generated by a pressure gradient that is due to a continuously maintained low sea level in the Southern Nordic Seas. This implies that the relative stability of the IF-inflow derives from the processes that lower the sea level by generating outflow from the Nordic Seas, especially the thermohaline processes that generate overflow. The IF-inflow is an important component of the system coupling the Arctic region to the North Atlantic through the thermohaline circulation, which has been predicted to weaken in the 21st century. Our observations show no indication of weakening. © Author(s) 2010.

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Geographical setting and characteristics of the IF-inflow and observational system. (a) Bottom topography (gray areas shallower than 500 m). Red arrows show the two main Atlantic inflow branches, the one across the IFR, which is bounded by the IcelandFaroe Front (IFF), and the one through the Faroe-Shetland Channel (FSC-inflow). The black line with rectangles labeled N01 to N14 is a standard section with fixed CTD stations. Yellow circles indicate the southernmost (NA) and northernmost (NC) ADCP mooring locations. Blue arrow indicates overflow through the Faroe Bank Channel (FBC-overflow). (b) The southern part of the standard section with the red area indicating water of salinity >35.00 on average 1997–2001 (based on Hansen et al., 2003). Thick black lines show average eastward velocities from summer 2000 to summer 2001 with values in cm s−1 (based on Hansen et al., 2003). Yellow circles indicate moored ADCPs with typical ranges indicated by yellow cones.
  • Fig. 2. Average temperature (a) and salinity (b) distribution on the standard section, based on 46 CTD cruises 1997–2008.
  • Fig. 3. Volume transport of Atlantic water across the IFR (red) plotted against the month (a) and time (b) of observation. On (b), the blue curves show the SLH difference across the IFR as measured by hu−hd (defined in Fig. 11). Thin lines: monthly (four weeks) averages. Thick lines: annual averages (summer to summer).
  • Fig. 4. (a) Temperature (red) and salinity (blue) in the core of the Faroe Current based on hydrographic surveys along the standard section. The typical seasonal variation was subtracted from the data before plotting. Broken lines indicate the trend from summer 1997 to summer 2008 based on linear regression. (b) Transport of relative heat (red) in TW (1012 W) and salt (blue) in kTonnes s−1 (106 kg s−1).
  • Fig. 5. Progressive vector diagrams for the flow at 225 m depth from 4 moored ADCPs (Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers) upstream of or on the IFR (a) and from 6 moored ADCPs on the standard section (b). The records are from different periods and have different durations between 8 and 12 months. Mooring locations are shown as red circles, from which the progressive vector diagrams extend as red traces. The progressive vector diagrams have been scaled to show the residual velocities in the scale shown on (b). The region bounded by green lines on (a) was used for calculating the flushing time from upstream to the standard section (Appendix A).
  • Fig. 7. Correlation coefficients between monthly averaged SLH on the white line (hu) and SLH in altimeter grid points.
  • Fig. 6. Sketch illustrating the passage of a water parcel (white circle) across the IFR along an arbitrary path (curved white arrow) with u representing speed, p representing pressure, and z representing height of the parcel above a geopotential surface (Gill, 1982).
  • Fig. 8. Model geometry and notation. (a) The white lines indicate the triangular model geometry superposed on the typical salinity (background colours, based on Fig. 2b) and eastward velocity (based on Hansen et al., 2003) distributions. (b) A slice of Atlantic water in the model of thickness L (D= 350 m, B = 100 km).

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Observations: Ocean

0
554Citations
1213Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hansen, B., Hátún, H., Kristiansen, R., Olsen, S. M., & Østerhus, S. (2010). Stability and forcing of the Iceland-Faroe inflow of water, heat, and salt to the Arctic. Ocean Science, 6(4), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-6-1013-2010

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 27

54%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 33

67%

Environmental Science 8

16%

Physics and Astronomy 4

8%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0