Stably stratified canopy flow in complex terrain

10Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stably stratified canopy flow in complex terrain has been considered a difficult condition for measuring net ecosystem-atmosphere exchanges of carbon, water vapor, and energy. A long-standing advection error in eddy-flux measurements is caused by stably stratified canopy flow. Such a condition with strong thermal gradient and less turbulent air is also difficult for modeling. To understand the challenging atmospheric condition for eddy-flux measurements, we use the renormalized group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model to investigate the main characteristics of stably stratified canopy flows in complex terrain. In this two-dimensional simulation, we imposed persistent constant heat flux at ground surface and linearly increasing cooling rate in the upper-canopy layer, vertically varying dissipative force from canopy drag elements, buoyancy forcing induced from thermal stratification and the hill terrain. These strong boundary effects keep nonlinearity in the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations high enough to generate turbulent behavior. The fundamental characteristics of nighttime canopy flow over complex terrain measured by the small number of available multi-tower advection experiments can be reproduced by this numerical simulation, such as (1) unstable layer in the canopy and super-stable layers associated with flow decoupling in deep canopy and near the top of canopy; (2) sub-canopy drainage flow and drainage flow near the top of canopy in calm night; (3) upward momentum transfer in canopy, downward heat transfer in upper canopy and upward heat transfer in deep canopy; and (4) large buoyancy suppression and weak shear production in strong stability.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Simulated streamlines in the forested hill: (a)H/L= 0.6; (b) H/L= 1.0. The translucent green masks indicate the regimes with instability within the canopy. The top of the canopy is marked by black-dashed line. The black “WV” marks the region of wake vortices next to the edge of canopy. The “DS” in (a) and “UD” in (b) indicate the region of down-sweep wind and updraft wind on the gentle and steep slopes, respectively.
  • Figure 3. Potential temperature (K) profiles on the slope for H/L= 0.6 (blue) andH/L= 1.0 (red). The locations of the six sections are labeled as (a)–(f), and their locations with respect to the hill are presented. Horizontal distances are normalized by the halflength scale L of the hill. The cyan blue curves indicate the thermal transition zone with negative temperature gradient.
  • Figure 2. Contours of potential temperature (K) along the right slope: (a) H/L= 0.6; (b) H/L= 1.0. The difference between isotherms is 0.25 K. The numbers on isotherms indicate the temperature. The x axis is normalized by the half-length scale of the hill L and y axis is normalized by the height of the canopy h. Whitedashed lines indicate the top of canopy and the isotherms marked with cyan-dashed lines highlight the “fish-head” temperature distribution.
  • Figure 4. Locations of super-stable layers for H/L= 0.6 and H/L= 1.0 (left panel). The primary super-stable layers are marked by dash-dotted lines with yellow solid circles and secondary superstable layers are marked by dash-dotted lines with green solid circles. The Ri numbers at locations indicated by the yellow and green solid circles are extremely large, which are illustrated on the right panel for the locations (b) and (e). PSL denotes primary super-stable layer. SSL denotes secondary super-stable layer. UL denotes unstable layer.
  • Figure 5. Profiles of streamwise velocity (u; m s−1; top panel) and vertical velocity (w; m s−1; bottom panel) forH/L= 0.6 (blue) and H/L= 1.0 (red). The locations of the six sections are labeled as (a)–(f), and their locations with respect to the hill are marked in Fig. 3 with the same letters. Note that wind velocity on the slope surface is not zero because the centers of bottom grid cells in the numerical calculation are not exactly at the surface.
  • Figure 6. Wind velocity (U , m s−1) on the slopes for (a)H/L= 0.6 and (b) H/L= 1.0. The white solid lines are streamlines as shown in Fig. 1. The black-white-dashed lines denote the top of the canopy.
  • Figure 7. Profiles of shear stress, u′w′ (10−3 m2 s−2) on the slope for H/L= 0.6(blue) and H/L= 1.0 (red). The locations of the six sections are labeled as (a)–(f), and their locations with respect to the hill are marked in Fig. 3 with the same letters.
  • Figure 8. Profiles of turbulent heat flux, −w′θ ′ (10−2 K m s−1) on the slope for H/L= 0.6 (blue) and H/L= 1.0 (red). The locations of the six sections are labeled as (a)–(f), and their locations with respect to the hill are marked in Fig. 3 with the same letters.

References Powered by Scopus

Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory

4067Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique

2603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Turbulence in plant canopies

1329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): Overview of pilot measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gases, and aerosols

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Atmospheric diffusion profiles and health risks of typical VOC: Numerical modelling study

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Study of the flow fields over simplified topographies with different roughness conditions using large eddy simulations

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, X., Yi, C., & Kutter, E. (2015). Stably stratified canopy flow in complex terrain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(13), 7457–7470. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7457-2015

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

59%

Researcher 7

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 7

39%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

22%

Engineering 4

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0