Straw application in paddy soil enhances methane production also from other carbon sources

67Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Flooded rice fields are an important source of the greenhouse gas methane. Methane is produced from rice straw (RS), soil organic matter (SOM), and rice root organic carbon (ROC). Addition of RS is widely used for ameliorating soil fertility. However, this practice provides additional substrate for CH4 production and results in increased CH4 emission. Here, we found that decomposing RS is not only a substrate of CH4 production, but in addition stimulates CH4 production from SOM and ROC. Apart from accelerating the creation of reduced conditions in the soil environment, RS decomposition resulted in enhancement of SOM-derived CH4 production. In particular, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis from SOM-derived CO2 was stimulated, presumably by H2 released from RS decomposition. On the other hand, the enhancement of ROC-derived CH4 production after RS application was probably caused by the significant increase of the abundance of methanogenic Archaea in the RS treatment compared with the untreated control. Our results show that traditional management of rice residues exerts a positive feedback on CH4 production from rice fields, thus exacerbating its effect on the global CH4 budget. © 2014 Author(s).

Figures

  • Table 1. CH4 production rates in soil sampled from microcosms with and without rice plant and rice straw (RS), mean ±SD (n= 4).
  • Fig. 1. Rates of CH4 production and CH4 emission measured during incubation of planted rice microcosms without and with addition of rice straw; means ±SD (n= 4).
  • Fig. 2. Production rates of CH4 and abundance of methanogens and Bacteria in planted microcosms without and with RS application. (A) Individual CH4 production derived from ROC (pROC) and SOM (pSOM) with RS application compared to total CH4 production (pROC+ pSOM) without RS addition. The differences between pROC+pSOM without RS and pROC or pSOM with RS were tested by one-tailed independent t test, indicated beside the bars by ∗∗ when P < 0.01 or ∗ when P < 0.05. The differences between pROC+pSOM without and with RS were tested as described above, indicated on the top of the bars by ## when P < 0.01 or # when P < 0.05; (B) mcrA gene (characteristic for methanogenic Archaea) and (C) bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers without and with RS application; means ±SD (n= 4). The differences between the treatments over time were examined using Duncan’s post hoc test of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Different letters on the top of bars indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between the data.
  • Fig. 3. Production of CH4 (A), δ13C value of produced CH4 (B) and SOM-derived CH4 production (C) in control soil and treatments with 0.5 % 13C-labeled RS I or II after 40 days of anoxic pre-incubation. The RS was applied at the beginning of anoxic incubation. The headspace of all bottles was re-flushed with N2 after 40 days of anoxic incubation. Therefore, “day 0” on the x axis corresponds to the actual date of “day 40” in the entire incubation period. Data are means ±SD (n= 3). The differences between control and RS treatment in SOM-derived CH4 production were tested by two-tailed independent t test, indicated by ∗ when P < 0.05.
  • Fig. 4. Production of CH4 (A), SOM-derived CH4 production (B), SOM-derived CH4 production in the presence of 1 % CH3F (C) and total amount of SOM-derived CH4 and TIC (D) in control soil and treatments with 0.1 % or 0.2 % 13C-labeled RS I or II. The RS was applied after 40 days of anoxic pre-incubation of rice soil, and then the headspace of all bottles was re-flushed with N2. Therefore, “day 0” on the x axis corresponds to the actual date of “day 40” in the entire incubation period. Data are means ±SD (n= 3). The total amount of SOM-derived CH4 and TIC were calculated at day 25 after RS application. The differences between control and RS treatments were tested by two-tailed independent t test only in (B) and (D), indicated by ∗ when P < 0.05.
  • Table 2. Production rates of TIC and CH4 derived from 0.1 % or 0.2 % 13C-labeled RS applied after 40 days of anoxic incubation of untreated control soil or RS-treated soil. For RS-treated soil, rice soil was amended with 0.5 % unlabeled RS at the beginning of anoxic incubation. The headspace of all bottles was re-flushed with N2 after addition of 13C-labeled RS. This labeled RS was used as proxy of ROC in this experiment. Data are means±SD (n= 3). The differences in RS-derived TIC or CH4 production rates among the treatments were examined using Duncan’s post hoc test of ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between the data.

References Powered by Scopus

Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter

1626Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-CO <inf>2</inf> greenhouse gases and climate change

1073Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane

624Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Microbial stoichiometric flexibility regulates rice straw mineralization and its priming effect in paddy soil

226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of using rice straw and cotton stalk ashes on the properties of lightweight self-compacting concrete

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rice rhizodeposits affect organic matter priming in paddy soil: The role of N fertilization and plant growth for enzyme activities, CO<inf>2</inf> and CH<inf>4</inf> emissions

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yuan, Q., Pump, J., & Conrad, R. (2014). Straw application in paddy soil enhances methane production also from other carbon sources. Biogeosciences, 11(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-237-2014

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

72%

Researcher 8

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15

34%

Environmental Science 14

32%

Engineering 10

23%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0