SWAT Modeling of Water Quantity and Quality in the Tennessee River Basin: Spatiotemporal Calibration and Validation

  • Wang G
  • Jager H
  • Baskaran L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© Author(s) 2016. Model-data comparisons are always challenging, especially when working at a large spatial scale and evaluating multiple response variables. We implemented the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to simulate water quantity and quality for the Tennessee River Basin. We developed three innovations to overcome hurdles associated with limited data for model evaluation: 1) we implemented an auto-calibration approach to allow simultaneous calibration against multiple responses, including intermediate response variables, 2) we identified empirical spatiotemporal datasets to use in our comparison, and 3) we compared functional patterns in landuse-nutrient relationships between SWAT and empirical data. Comparing monthly SWAT-simulated runoff against USGS data produced satisfactory median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiencies of 0.83 and 0.72 for calibration and validation periods, respectively. SWAT-simulated water quality responses (sediment, TP, TN, and inorganic N) reproduced the seasonal patterns found in LOADEST data. SWAT-simulated spatial TN loadings were significantly correlated with empirical SPARROW estimates. The spatial correlation analyses indicated that SWAT-modeled runoff was primarily controlled by precipitation; sedimentation was controlled by topography; and NO3and soluble P were highly influenced by land management, particularly the proportion of agricultural lands in a subbasin.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, G., Jager, H. I., Baskaran, L. M., Baker, T. F., & Brandt, C. C. (2016). SWAT Modeling of Water Quantity and Quality in the Tennessee River Basin: Spatiotemporal Calibration and Validation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-34

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

67%

Researcher 15

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 24

45%

Environmental Science 17

32%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 6

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free