Turbulence observations in the Gulf of Trieste under moderate wind forcing and different water column stratification

9Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The oceanographic campaign CARPET2014 (Characterizing Adriatic Region Preconditionig EvenTs), (30 January-4 February 2014) collected the very first turbulence data in the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea) under moderate wind (average wind speed 10 m s-1) and heat flux (net negative heat flux ranging from 150 to 400 W m-2). Observations consisted of 38 CTD (Conductivity, Temperature, Depth) casts and 478 microstructure profiles (grouped into 145 ensembles) with three sets of yoyo casts, each lasting for about 12 consecutive hours. Averaging closely repeated casts, such as the ensembles, can lead to a smearing effect when in the presence of a vertical density structure with strong interfaces that can move up or down between subsequent casts under the influence of tides and internal waves. In order to minimize the smearing effect of such displacements on mean quantities, we developed an algorithm to realign successive microstructure profiles to produce sharper and more meaningful mean profiles of measured turbulence parameters. During the campaign, the water column in the gulf evolved from well-mixed to stratified conditions due to Adriatic waters intruding at the bottom along the gulf's south-eastern coast. We show that during the warm and relatively dry winter, the water column in the Gulf of Trieste, even under moderate wind forcing, was not completely mixed due to the influence of bottom waters intruding from the open sea. Inside the gulf, two types of water intrusions were found during yoyo casts: one coming from the northern coast of the Adriatic Sea (i.e. cooler, fresher and more turbid) and one coming from the open sea in front of the Po Delta (i.e. warmer, saltier and less turbid). The two intrusions had different impacts on turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate profiles. The former, with high turbidity, acted as a barrier to wind-driven turbulence, while the latter, with low sediment concentrations and a smaller vertical density gradient, was not able to suppress downward penetration of turbulence from the surface.

Figures

  • Figure 1. (Left panel) location of the CARPET2014 stations inside the GoT. Red dots denote CTD stations; green circles MSS stations, red and blue squares MSS yoyo sites from Y01 and Y02/Y03, respectively, yellow dot points out the VIDA buoy. The insert shows the location of the Adriatic Sea inside the Mediterranean Sea. (Right panel) stations of the entire CARPET2014 cruise. Red dots show locations of CTD casts, black rectangle marks the area of the CTD casts considered representative of open-sea waters (see Fig. 4), the green circle shows the station used as Y02 and Y03 casts end points.
  • Table 1. Specifics of each yoyo set. Times are in UTC.
  • Table 2. Bias, root mean square error (RMSE) and percent RMSE computed for the ISMAR and NIB MSS probes compared to CTD measurements.
  • Figure 2. Atmospheric and sea-surface observations and fluxes collected from the R/V Urania (left panels) and VIDA buoy (right panels). (a) Air (red) and sea (blue) temperature time series; (b) wind speed (light green) and wind direction (black); (c) net (blue line), latent (light blue) and sensible (orange) heat fluxes computed with the COARE algorithm and buoyancy flux (magenta); (d) wind stress (cyano), Monin– Obukhov length (black) and Stokes drift (dark green). Given that the maximum depth of the GoT is 25 m, Lmo is shown up to −250 m depth to provide a clearer representation of the water column. Lmo values can be as low as −1200 m during calm periods. Vertical dashed lines show the yoyo cast collection time.
  • Figure 3. Bottom currents and values from CTD casts at surface and bottom are shown inside the GoT for 30 January (top panels), 31 January (central panels) and 4 February (bottom panels). Panels on the left column show the ADCP bottom cell currents; red arrows are observations taken during rising tide, blue arrows during falling tide. Temperature (second and third columns) and salinity (fourth and fifth columns) values are shown for surface (0 and 2.5 m) and bottom layers (last 2.5 m of cast) inside the GoT.
  • Figure 4. (Left panel) θ–S plot of all CTDs and MSSs (both ISMAR and NIB) casts (light grey for the northern Adriatic and dark grey for the GoT). The green and red dots are the MSS-ISMAR and MSS-NIB ensemble means for Y02 and Y03, respectively, light colour for surface values and dark colour for bottom ones. The green circle indicates the bottom waters observed at the entrance of the GoT on 30 January that are the end point for Y02 bottom waters; red circles point to deep waters outside the GoT on 4 January considered as the end point of Y03 bottom water. The black square encompasses values in bottom waters in the centre of the North Adriatic Sea. Locations of end points are shown in Fig. 1. The profiles of the cast leading to the end points are shown in light blue. (Right panel) θ–S plot for Y02 and Y03. Colour scale shows turbidity FTUs (formazin turbidity units) as measured by the back scatterometer mounted on the MSS ISMAR probe.
  • Figure 5. Regime diagram of turbulence forcing computed at the VIDA buoy from 2 February (14:30 UTC) to 4 February (12:00 UTC). Green and orange squares represents values before and after the Y03, red marks are the values for the ensembles shown in Fig. 9. The horizontal dashed line indicates the demarcation between convection dominated turbulence and shear stress dominated one; the vertical dashed line shows demarcation between conventional wind stress-driven turbulence and Stokes production-driven one.
  • Figure 6. Hovmöller diagrams for Y01: (a) wind stress and buoyancy flux during the Y01, (b) temperature profiles, (c) salinity profiles, (d) turbidity profiles in FTU, (e) turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in logarithmic scale (contours spaced in log of 1 W kg−1). Red dashed lines show the time of collection of the Y01 casts reported in top panels of Fig. 8.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
51Citations
63Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Falcieri, F. M., Kantha, L., Benetazzo, A., Bergamasco, A., Bonaldo, D., Barbariol, F., … Carniel, S. (2016). Turbulence observations in the Gulf of Trieste under moderate wind forcing and different water column stratification. Ocean Science, 12(2), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-433-2016

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

40%

Researcher 7

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 12

57%

Environmental Science 6

29%

Engineering 2

10%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0