Verification of an ADER-DG method for complex dynamic rupture problems

50Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present results of thorough benchmarking of an arbitrary high-order derivative discontinuous Galerkin (ADER-DG) method on unstructured meshes for advanced earthquake dynamic rupture problems. We verify the method by comparison to well-established numerical methods in a series of verification exercises, including dipping and branching fault geometries, heterogeneous initial conditions, bimaterial interfaces and several rate-and-state friction laws. We show that the combination of meshing flexibility and high-order accuracy of the ADER-DG method makes it a competitive tool to study earthquake dynamics in geometrically complicated setups. © Author(s) 2014.

References Powered by Scopus

Slip instability and state variable friction laws.

2607Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multilevelk-way Partitioning Scheme for Irregular Graphs

1234Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip

1133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A suite of exercises for verifying dynamic earthquake rupture codes

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coupled, Physics-Based Modeling Reveals Earthquake Displacements are Critical to the 2018 Palu, Sulawesi Tsunami

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Landers 1992 “Reloaded”: Integrative Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Modeling

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pelties, C., Gabriel, A. A., & Ampuero, J. P. (2014). Verification of an ADER-DG method for complex dynamic rupture problems. Geoscientific Model Development, 7(3), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-847-2014

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

63%

Researcher 6

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 18

78%

Engineering 3

13%

Computer Science 1

4%

Physics and Astronomy 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free