A vertically discretised canopy description for ORCHIDEE (SVN r2290) and the modifications to the energy, water and carbon fluxes

68Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since 70% of global forests are managed and forests impact the global carbon cycle and the energy exchange with the overlying atmosphere, forest management has the potential to mitigate climate change. Yet, none of the land-surface models used in Earth system models, and therefore none of today's predictions of future climate, accounts for the interactions between climate and forest management. We addressed this gap in modelling capability by developing and parametrising a version of the ORCHIDEE land-surface model to simulate the biogeochemical and biophysical effects of forest management. The most significant changes between the new branch called ORCHIDEE-CAN (SVN r2290) and the trunk version of ORCHIDEE (SVN r2243) are the allometric-based allocation of carbon to leaf, root, wood, fruit and reserve pools; the transmittance, absorbance and reflectance of radiation within the canopy; and the vertical discretisation of the energy budget calculations. In addition, conceptual changes were introduced towards a better process representation for the interaction of radiation with snow, the hydraulic architecture of plants, the representation of forest management and a numerical solution for the photosynthesis formalism of Farquhar, von Caemmerer and Berry. For consistency reasons, these changes were extensively linked throughout the code. Parametrisation was revisited after introducing 12 new parameter sets that represent specific tree species or genera rather than a group of often distantly related or even unrelated species, as is the case in widely used plant functional types. Performance of the new model was compared against the trunk and validated against independent spatially explicit data for basal area, tree height, canopy structure, gross primary production (GPP), albedo and evapotranspiration over Europe. For all tested variables, ORCHIDEE-CAN outperformed the trunk regarding its ability to reproduce large-scale spatial patterns as well as their inter-annual variability over Europe. Depending on the data stream, ORCHIDEE-CAN had a 67 to 92% chance to reproduce the spatial and temporal variability of the validation data.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Schematic overview of the changes in ORCHIDEE-CAN. For the trunk the most important processes and connections are indicated in black, while the processes and connections that were added or changed in ORCHIDEE-CAN are indicated in red. Numbered arrows are discussed in Sect. 2.2.
  • Table 2. Variable description. Variables were grouped as follows: F =flux, f = fraction, M = pool, m=modulator, d = stand dimension, T = temperature, p = pressure, R = resistance, q = humidity, g = function.
  • Table 2. Continued.
  • Figure 2. Root mean square error of ORCHIDEE-CAN for gross primary production, evapotranspiration, visible and near-infra-red albedo, effective leaf area index, basal area and height for different regions and periods (DJF: December–February, MAM: March–May, JJA: June– August, SON: September–November). The gray-scale of the symbols indicates the number of pixels included in the calculation. The transition from green to white indicates an RMSE of 100 %.
  • Figure 3. Root mean square error of ORCHIDEE trunk for gross primary production, evapotranspiration and visible and near-infrared albedo for different regions and periods (DJF: December–February; MAM: March–May; JJA: June–August; SON: September–November). The grey scale of the symbols indicates the number of pixels included in the calculation. The transition from green to white indicates an RMSE of 100 %.
  • Figure 4. Comparison between observations and simulations of ORCHIDEE-CAN for gross primary production and basal area over Europe. Gross primary production represents the mean for June– August between 2001–2010 and basal area is the value at the end of 2010.
  • Figure 5. Impact of the different forest management strategies on an oak forest for unmanged (green), high stand (orange) and coppice (blue) compared to a Poplar short rotation coppicing (red) at 48◦ N, 2◦ E. The simulation was run without spin-up to better visualise carbon build-up in the coarse woody debris (C.W.D.) pool. Simulation cycled of a single year (1990) of climate data to minimise the interannual variability due to climatic year-to-year variability
  • Figure 6. Root mean square error (RMSE) of tree diameter for different species (shown as different markers) for different regions over France (shown as A to K). Open triangle, Pinus sylvestris; open circle, Pinus pinaster; open square, Picea Sp.; filled diamond, Quercus ilex/suber; filled triangle, Betula Sp.; filled circle, Fagus sylvatica; filled square, Quercus robur/petraea.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naudts, K., Ryder, J., McGrath, M. J., Otto, J., Chen, Y., Valade, A., … Luyssaert, S. (2015). A vertically discretised canopy description for ORCHIDEE (SVN r2290) and the modifications to the energy, water and carbon fluxes. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(7), 2035–2065. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2035-2015

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

49%

Researcher 42

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 44

43%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 33

32%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

21%

Engineering 4

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0