Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis

24Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in order to determine the optimal tract size for patients with renal stones. Methods: A systematic search of Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases was conducted for articles published through 20 August 2019, reporting on a comparison of the standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of 763 studies, 14 were considered for the evidence synthesis. A total of 1980 cases were included. Of these patients, 897 cases underwent standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and 1083 cases underwent mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone-free rates were 87.6% (786 of 897 patients) for standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 87.8% (951 of 1083 patients) for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (p = 0.57). Tract sizes of 30F and 22–26F in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group shorten operation time compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (p = 0.02; p = 0.004; respectively). Leakage (p = 0.04), bleeding (p = 0.01), blood transfusion (p < 0.00001), and renal pelvis perforation (p = 0.02) were more common in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group than in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Subgroup analysis showed only blood transfusion for 30F and 22–26F standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group was more common than mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (p < 0.0001, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with higher leakage, bleeding, blood transfusion, and renal pelvis perforation, but had a shorter operation time. Tract size of 30F improved the stone-free rate compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, but led to more complications. Tract size of 22–26F was no better than 30F or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

References Powered by Scopus

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

43016Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias

14086Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

1065Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones?>2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent advances in percutaneous lithotripsy techniques

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deng, J., Li, J., Wang, L., Hong, Y., Zheng, L., Hu, J., & Kuang, R. (2021, September 1). Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496920920474

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

69%

Computer Science 2

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Psychology 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free