Release of data following a serious incident in the uk construction industry

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A fundamental part of the professional engineer’s duty is to keep abreast of contemporary information that is relevant to their particular area of work. In an industry where labour input (in its widest sense) predominates, despite all our software and sophisticated construction equipment, this is essential as scope for error is ever present. The nature of the construction industry is such that catastrophic failure, with the potential for multiple fatalities and other concerns, is a plausible scenario. Hence, in order for the forensic engineer to operate, and industry generally to learn from the misfortunes of others, the requisite data from serious incidents must be made available to the industry at large, comprehensively and timeously. As things stand in the UK, it is frequently not so available. This aim, namely to learn, is distinct from apportioning blame. This paper examines why this lack of data exists, touches on the practice in some other countries, and considers what might be done to alleviate the situation.

References Powered by Scopus

Lessons learned from the bridge collapse in Palau

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Barriers to achieving satisfactory dropped objects safety performance in the UK construction sector

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Topical issues regarding the causality of construction incidents

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Editorial

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carpenter, J. (2015). Release of data following a serious incident in the uk construction industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic Engineering, 168(3), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1680/feng.14.00009

Readers over time

‘16‘19‘20‘21‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

60%

Materials Science 1

20%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0