Perception of musical tension for nontonal orchestral timbres and its relation to psychoacoustic roughness

41Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Can tension in nontonal music be expressed without dynamic or rhythmic cues? Perceptual theories of tonal harmony predict that psychoacoustic roughness plays an important role in the perception of this tension. We chose a set of orchestrated chords from a nontonal piece and investigated listeners' judgments of musical tension and roughness. Paired comparisons yielded psychophysical scales of tension and roughness. Two experiments established distinct levels of these two attributes across chords. A model simulation reproduced the experimental roughness measures. The results indicate that nontonal tension could be perceived consistently on the basis of timbrai differences and that it was correlated with roughness, the correlation being stronger as the perceptual salience of other attributes (such as high-pitched tones or tonal intervals) was reduced.

References Powered by Scopus

Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components

6208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis

5024Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch

1175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tonal Pitch Space

349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward a general psychological model of tension and suspense

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pressnitzer, D., McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., & Fineberg, J. (2000). Perception of musical tension for nontonal orchestral timbres and its relation to psychoacoustic roughness. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212061

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘230481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

24%

Researcher 12

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 19

41%

Psychology 11

24%

Engineering 10

22%

Computer Science 6

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0