The classical theory of minimal surfaces

68Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present here a survey of recent spectacular successes in classical minimal surface theory. We highlight this article with the theorem that the plane, the helicoid, the catenoid and the one-parameter family {Rt}t∈(0,1) of Riemann minimal examples are the only complete, properly embedded, minimal planar domains in R{double-struck}3; the proof of this result depends primarily on work of Colding and Minicozzi, Collin, López and Ros, Meeks, Pérez and Ros, and Meeks and Rosenberg. Rather than culminating and ending the theory with this classification result, significant advances continue to be made as we enter a new golden age for classical minimal surface theory. Through our telling of the story of the classification of minimal planar domains, we hope to pass on to the general mathematical public a glimpse of the intrinsic beauty of classical minimal surface theory and our own perspective of what is happening at this historical moment in a very classical subject. © 2011 American Mathematical Society Reverts to public domain 28 years from publication. © 2011 American Mathematical Society.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meeks, W. H., & Pérez, J. (2011). The classical theory of minimal surfaces. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 48(3), 325–407. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-2011-01334-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

24%

Researcher 12

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 29

47%

Engineering 28

45%

Physics and Astronomy 3

5%

Computer Science 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free