A Survey of Risk-Aware Multi-Armed Bandits

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In several applications such as clinical trials and financial portfolio optimization, the expected value (or the average reward) does not satisfactorily capture the merits of a drug or a portfolio. In such applications, risk plays a crucial role, and a risk-aware performance measure is preferable, so as to capture losses in the case of adverse events. This survey aims to consolidate and summarise the existing research on risk measures, specifically in the context of multi-armed bandits. We review various risk measures of interest, and comment on their properties. Next, we review existing concentration inequalities for various risk measures. Then, we proceed to defining risk-aware bandit problems, We consider algorithms for the regret minimization setting, where the exploration-exploitation trade-off manifests, as well as the best-arm identification setting, which is a pure exploration problem-both in the context of risk-sensitive measures. We conclude by commenting on persisting challenges and fertile areas for future research.

References Powered by Scopus

PORTFOLIO SELECTION

16738Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

9993Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coherent measures of risk

5464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Almost Optimal Variance-Constrained Best Arm Identification

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk-Aware Linear Bandits with Application in Smart Order Routing

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, V. Y. F., Prashanth, L. A., & Jagannathan, K. (2022). A Survey of Risk-Aware Multi-Armed Bandits. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5623–5629). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/784

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

25%

Engineering 2

25%

Mathematics 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free