Inference and missing data

7.1kCitations
Citations of this article
2.8kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

SUMMARY: When making sampling distribution inferences about the parameter of the data, θ, it is appropriate to ignore the process that causes missing data if the missing data are 'missing at random' and the observed data are 'observed at random', but these inferences are generally conditional on the observed pattern of missing data. When making direct-likelihood or Bayesian inferences about θ, it is appropriate to ignore the process that causes missing data if the missing data are missing at random and the parameter of the missing data process is 'distinct' from θ. These conditions are the weakest general conditions under which ignoring the process that causes missing data always leads to correct inferences. © 1976 Biometrika Trust.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Structural equations with latent variables

18370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical analysis with missing data

13992Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Missing data: Our view of the state of the art

9138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1243

65%

Researcher 380

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 211

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 74

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 289

28%

Mathematics 268

26%

Social Sciences 260

25%

Psychology 231

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free